Bulbapedia talk:Featured article candidates: Difference between revisions
PsychicRider (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
:A comment just made by TTE on another page about how he wishes people would be more enthusiastic about featuring articles reminded me of this. Are we ''ever'' going to make one of these article featured? There are so many nominees, and so many votes. I even recently made a new nomination myself. Is anything ever going to happen? --[[User:ElectAbuzzzz|electAbuzzzz]] <sup>([[User talk:ElectAbuzzzz|TALK]])</sup> 20:36, 12 August 2008 (UTC) | :A comment just made by TTE on another page about how he wishes people would be more enthusiastic about featuring articles reminded me of this. Are we ''ever'' going to make one of these article featured? There are so many nominees, and so many votes. I even recently made a new nomination myself. Is anything ever going to happen? --[[User:ElectAbuzzzz|electAbuzzzz]] <sup>([[User talk:ElectAbuzzzz|TALK]])</sup> 20:36, 12 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
::Nothing probably will, and [[Ash Ketchum|some articles]] I don't even think deserve to be nominated...but that last part was just my opinion.--[[User:PsychicRider|<sup style="color:#000000;">'''Psychic'''</sup>]][[User talk:PsychicRider|<sub style="color:#000000;">'''Rider'''</sub>]]''<small>''[[Special:Contributions/PsychicRider|<sup style="color:#000000;">'''☆'''</sup>]]''</small> 21:16, 12 August 2008 (UTC) | ::Nothing probably will, and [[Ash Ketchum|some articles]] I don't even think deserve to be nominated...but that last part was just my opinion.--[[User:PsychicRider|<sup style="color:#000000;">'''Psychic'''</sup>]][[User talk:PsychicRider|<sub style="color:#000000;">'''Rider'''</sub>]]''<small>''[[Special:Contributions/PsychicRider|<sup style="color:#000000;">'''☆'''</sup>]]''</small> 21:16, 12 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
::: Ultimately this is just a way for users to point out pages to the people in charge; the people in charge are the ones who actually decide whether or not to accept or reject a nomination. The actual vote counts don't really matter. At the moment no-one is in charge... - [[User:Zhen Lin|振霖]]<sub>[[User talk:Zhen Lin|T]]</sub> 02:54, 13 August 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:54, 13 August 2008
Why not use numbered lists and remove the number from the heading? - Jshadias 05:36, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- If the number is in the heading, you can see the counts at a glance from the TOC. - 振霖T 16:06, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Oh, I see. I still think it'd be a good idea to use numbered lists though, to make errors in the heading's count stand out. - Jshadias 16:23, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This didn't really pan out, huh? It always sort of makes me sad when I look at this page. --Pie 06:37, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
... it'd, uh, help a lot if people actually voted on these... --Pie ~♪♫ 06:05, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
How many votes does it take to become a featured article? File:Ani164MS.gifShinyTalk | ContribsFile:Ani408MS.gifFile:Ani410MS.gif 20:41, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Are we going to have another featured article one day? GlinnFile:Ani202MS.gif 11:28, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
I hope I make a featured article someday... *batters eyelashes dreamily* File:Ani417MS.gifPLFile:Ani026MS.gif12File:Ani181MS.gif19:24, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
...Dissapointing, this is. Still no more featured articles. Surely you've had enough time to "get your act together." Glinn Mgraw 05:57, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Is it really that hard? Glinn Mgraw 14:52, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
COUGH HACK ANYONE THERE?! Glinn Mgraw 10:10, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Pathetic. I don't like talking to myself. Surely there is an article out there that can be featured? Surely? Glinn Mgraw 10:08, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Oh yes, I second that! I really think the Ash article should be featured! It's very detailed and well-written. It's also very interesting as well. ^_^ --PokemonTrainerLisa 10:24, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Can't this be a Featured Article Nominee? Misty-May-Dawn rulz 09:40, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Bulbasaur
Should be nominated, no? I didn't do it myself (yet) only because I am pressed for time. Theininen 22:51, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- I don't think any article should be featured. Nothing happens. It's not like it ever gets promoted to the front page or anything. Porygon-Z 22:52, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
How much votes
How much votes are needed before an article is accepted (or rejected)? MathijsP 16:02, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
- Answer please. MathijsP 14:55, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
- *shrugs* TTEchidna 07:17, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- How much.
- How much.
- Really? You really want to know?
- OK. You need three kilograms of votes before it's enough.
- You figure that out. --Martonimos((Argh|Blargh)) 07:45, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- *shrugs* TTEchidna 07:17, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Right, OK
I highly suggest that, going at the current rate of featured articles we have that we would not need the featured article nomination page. Or is just there for looks? Glinn Mgraw 06:50, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- A comment just made by TTE on another page about how he wishes people would be more enthusiastic about featuring articles reminded me of this. Are we ever going to make one of these article featured? There are so many nominees, and so many votes. I even recently made a new nomination myself. Is anything ever going to happen? --electAbuzzzz (TALK) 20:36, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
- Nothing probably will, and some articles I don't even think deserve to be nominated...but that last part was just my opinion.--PsychicRider☆ 21:16, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
- Ultimately this is just a way for users to point out pages to the people in charge; the people in charge are the ones who actually decide whether or not to accept or reject a nomination. The actual vote counts don't really matter. At the moment no-one is in charge... - 振霖T 02:54, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Nothing probably will, and some articles I don't even think deserve to be nominated...but that last part was just my opinion.--PsychicRider☆ 21:16, 12 August 2008 (UTC)