Talk:First partner Pokémon/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Aura-Knight (talk | contribs) m (→Object (1)) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
*The article is quite good, compared to some others. It relates to both games and anime quite well, unlike some others.--[[User:Wowy|Wowy]] 07:36, 13 August 2008 (UTC) | *The article is quite good, compared to some others. It relates to both games and anime quite well, unlike some others.--[[User:Wowy|Wowy]] 07:36, 13 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
===Object ( | ===Object (3)=== | ||
*While I ''do'' like this article, I feel it's a little too much of a list to be featured. First it's a long list of starters in the games, then it's a ridiculously long list of trivia points... --[[User:ElectAbuzzzz|electAbuzzzz]] <sup>([[User talk:ElectAbuzzzz|TALK]])</sup> 09:28, 13 August 2008 (UTC) | *While I ''do'' like this article, I feel it's a little too much of a list to be featured. First it's a long list of starters in the games, then it's a ridiculously long list of trivia points... --[[User:ElectAbuzzzz|electAbuzzzz]] <sup>([[User talk:ElectAbuzzzz|TALK]])</sup> 09:28, 13 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
*Ditto to the above. There are much better articles out there. [[User:Aura-Knight|Aura-Knight]] 15:57, 22 August 2008 (UTC) | *Ditto to the above. There are much better articles out there. [[User:Aura-Knight|Aura-Knight]] 15:57, 22 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
*Agreed. It's good, but too much of a list to be considered featured. [[User:Arceus548|Arceus548]] 17:49, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
===Other comments=== | ===Other comments=== | ||
Revision as of 17:49, 24 August 2008
Support (2)
- This article is very informative of each starter of all the games as well as in other media. --ケンジのガール 07:33, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- The article is quite good, compared to some others. It relates to both games and anime quite well, unlike some others.--Wowy 07:36, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Object (3)
- While I do like this article, I feel it's a little too much of a list to be featured. First it's a long list of starters in the games, then it's a ridiculously long list of trivia points... --electAbuzzzz (TALK) 09:28, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Ditto to the above. There are much better articles out there. Aura-Knight 15:57, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed. It's good, but too much of a list to be considered featured. Arceus548 17:49, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
