Template talk:Gp: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
(→OK, remember when I said it will hardly ever happen again?: new section) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
''[[Glitch Pokémon|Glitch]] and [[Pokémon|Official]] Pokémon. There is no real difference between the two. [[User talk:Missingno. Master|In my opinion]], the two [[User:Missingno. Master/The Order of the Glitch|should be considered equal]]!<span style="color:#FF0000">--</span> quoted by {{u|Missingno. Master}} | ''[[Glitch Pokémon|Glitch]] and [[Pokémon|Official]] Pokémon. There is no real difference between the two. [[User talk:Missingno. Master|In my opinion]], the two [[User:Missingno. Master/The Order of the Glitch|should be considered equal]]!<span style="color:#FF0000">--</span> quoted by {{u|Missingno. Master}} | ||
</small> 01:56, 3 February 2008 (UTC) | </small> 01:56, 3 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
== OK, remember when I said it will hardly ever happen again? == | |||
I think that the necessity for [[PkMn]] to be moved to [[PkMn (Glitch Pokémon)]], so as to create a disambig (as PKMN is a common abbreviation for Pokémon) means that there may be some difficulty in linking to that article. Oh, if only there was a link template that could help us... Oh yeah, there used to be one, didn't there? Now, I think that this recent move opens up the necessity for this link template. Delete if there's enough reason to do so. <small>I'm [[User:Missingno. Master|Missingno. Master]], and I approve this [[User Talk:Missingno. Master|message.]]</small> 10:42, 10 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:42, 10 September 2008
So, again, MM, WHY? What is the reason for this template? The {{p}} is because there are several Pikachu, Charizard, Squirtle, and so on in the anime, manga, and other media. There is NEVER going to be any other Missingno. in any canon. It is a placeholder in the games. Nothing more. TTEchidna
GSDS! 00:46, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Alright, alright, sheesh. Just an idea. It will hardly ever happen again. -- Glitch and Official Pokémon. There is no real difference between the two. In my opinion, the two should be considered equal!-- quoted by Missingno. Master 01:56, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
OK, remember when I said it will hardly ever happen again?
I think that the necessity for PkMn to be moved to PkMn (Glitch Pokémon), so as to create a disambig (as PKMN is a common abbreviation for Pokémon) means that there may be some difficulty in linking to that article. Oh, if only there was a link template that could help us... Oh yeah, there used to be one, didn't there? Now, I think that this recent move opens up the necessity for this link template. Delete if there's enough reason to do so. I'm Missingno. Master, and I approve this message. 10:42, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
