User talk:Maxim: Difference between revisions
(→I'm a little confused: new section) |
|||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
After looking through that page history, I'm not sure to what you're referring. I can't see any of the deletion comments on that image that mention other users. -- '''[[User:evkl|<span style="color:#000099">evkl</span>]]''' <sub>[[User_talk:evkl|<span style="color:#006699">(need to talk?)</span>]]</sub> 14:40, 26 August 2009 (UTC) | After looking through that page history, I'm not sure to what you're referring. I can't see any of the deletion comments on that image that mention other users. -- '''[[User:evkl|<span style="color:#000099">evkl</span>]]''' <sub>[[User_talk:evkl|<span style="color:#006699">(need to talk?)</span>]]</sub> 14:40, 26 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Kuki was hotlinking us from other sites, so we changed the image to discourage him. It seemed to work. -- '''[[User:evkl|<span style="color:#000099">evkl</span>]]''' <sub>[[User_talk:evkl|<span style="color:#006699">(need to talk?)</span>]]</sub> 18:51, 26 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:51, 26 August 2009
Maxim's Talk Page Archives: 1, 2
i think your right
Maxim it looks like that is the case, once an admin is in power, they can do whatever they want, there is no removing them no matter how much the misbehave. I mean maybe I did some bad stuff, like got into an argument, but no way do I deserve a permanent ban. Max King 11:00, 17 July 2009 (UTC) Retrieved from "http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/User_talk:Max_King"
Why?
Why are you the enemy of Atheists, I'm an Atheist, I don't want to be your enemy, I want to be your friend... Prof. Pine 20:44 19 July 2009 (UTC)
- Guys, move this to the forums. I may not agree with Maxim on this either, Pine, but this has nothing to do with Bulbapedia and it'll drag an argument that doesn't belong here. --electAbuzzzz 20:50, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
OK, I'm soz Maxim if I was harsh on you, also next time I'll remember use the forum's ;) Prof. Pine 18:08 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Playing Nice
If you don't agree with somebody, that isn't a license to bash them. Play nice. You could get a good head start on playing nice if you apologized. And make it heartfelt--not just because I asked you to. -- evkl (need to talk?) 19:04, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- There's a big difference between permitting something in that you believe is wrong and being nice. And it does work--because if it didn't, well, I'd support the way you acted towards him. But you were hostile, for no good reason. Your "years of research" on the name of a light house are fantastic, but you could've been a lot nicer and more accomodating of the issue than you were. That may be my opinion but it's also an opinion I'm sticking to. -- evkl (need to talk?) 11:04, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
I'm a little confused
After looking through that page history, I'm not sure to what you're referring. I can't see any of the deletion comments on that image that mention other users. -- evkl (need to talk?) 14:40, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- Kuki was hotlinking us from other sites, so we changed the image to discourage him. It seemed to work. -- evkl (need to talk?) 18:51, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
