Talk:Flareon (Pokémon): Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Bbbbbbbbba (talk | contribs) (→Wrong Sentence, I think?: new section) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
When I wanted to access the description of a TCG booster pack, I typed "booster" and ended up here (as I forgot Booster is also the japanese name of Flareon). So the question is, should we make a disambiguation page between the Pokemon and the Booster pack? [[User:Yohrd|Yohrd]] 07:48, 11 May 2009 (UTC) | When I wanted to access the description of a TCG booster pack, I typed "booster" and ended up here (as I forgot Booster is also the japanese name of Flareon). So the question is, should we make a disambiguation page between the Pokemon and the Booster pack? [[User:Yohrd|Yohrd]] 07:48, 11 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Sure. Here's good. Just like [[Ghost]]. '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#DAA520">''TTE''</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#C0C0C0">chidna</span>]]''' 12:27, 11 May 2009 (UTC) | :Sure. Here's good. Just like [[Ghost]]. '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#DAA520">''TTE''</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#C0C0C0">chidna</span>]]''' 12:27, 11 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Wrong Sentence, I think? == | |||
In Generations I and II, and if Skill Swap or Gastro Acid is used, or if the opponent has Mold Breaker, the effectiveness of Fire-type moves is ½×. | |||
The sentence I refered to in Jolteon's talk page is at most ambiguous, but this one is certainly wrong. It *has* the "and" after the first condition. Isn't it wrong? |
Revision as of 10:30, 27 August 2009
Disambig?
When I wanted to access the description of a TCG booster pack, I typed "booster" and ended up here (as I forgot Booster is also the japanese name of Flareon). So the question is, should we make a disambiguation page between the Pokemon and the Booster pack? Yohrd 07:48, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Wrong Sentence, I think?
In Generations I and II, and if Skill Swap or Gastro Acid is used, or if the opponent has Mold Breaker, the effectiveness of Fire-type moves is ½×.
The sentence I refered to in Jolteon's talk page is at most ambiguous, but this one is certainly wrong. It *has* the "and" after the first condition. Isn't it wrong?