Talk:Flareon (Pokémon): Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
When I wanted to access the description of a TCG booster pack, I typed "booster" and ended up here (as I forgot Booster is also the japanese name of Flareon). So the question is, should we make a disambiguation page between the Pokemon and the Booster pack? [[User:Yohrd|Yohrd]] 07:48, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
When I wanted to access the description of a TCG booster pack, I typed "booster" and ended up here (as I forgot Booster is also the japanese name of Flareon). So the question is, should we make a disambiguation page between the Pokemon and the Booster pack? [[User:Yohrd|Yohrd]] 07:48, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
:Sure. Here's good. Just like [[Ghost]]. '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#DAA520">''TTE''</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#C0C0C0">chidna</span>]]''' 12:27, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
:Sure. Here's good. Just like [[Ghost]]. '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#DAA520">''TTE''</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#C0C0C0">chidna</span>]]''' 12:27, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
== Wrong Sentence, I think? ==
In Generations I and II, and if Skill Swap or Gastro Acid is used, or if the opponent has Mold Breaker, the effectiveness of  Fire-type  moves is ½×.
The sentence I refered to in Jolteon's talk page is at most ambiguous, but this one is certainly wrong. It *has* the "and" after the first condition. Isn't it wrong?

Revision as of 10:30, 27 August 2009

Disambig?

When I wanted to access the description of a TCG booster pack, I typed "booster" and ended up here (as I forgot Booster is also the japanese name of Flareon). So the question is, should we make a disambiguation page between the Pokemon and the Booster pack? Yohrd 07:48, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Sure. Here's good. Just like Ghost. TTEchidna 12:27, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Wrong Sentence, I think?

In Generations I and II, and if Skill Swap or Gastro Acid is used, or if the opponent has Mold Breaker, the effectiveness of Fire-type moves is ½×.

The sentence I refered to in Jolteon's talk page is at most ambiguous, but this one is certainly wrong. It *has* the "and" after the first condition. Isn't it wrong?