Talk:Berry/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Created page with '{{subst:FAC talk}}') |
ElectAbuzzzz (talk | contribs) m (Protected "Talk:Berry/Featured article candidate": vote closed ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))) |
||
| (15 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==[[Berry]]==__NOTOC__ | ==[[Berry]]==__NOTOC__ | ||
====Support ( | ====Support (4)==== | ||
<!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.--> | <!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.--> | ||
* | *'''Support''' A very comprehensive article with information on every stage in the history of berries, from Gen II to Gen IV. Aesthetically pleasing, it is evident that a lot of time and effort went in to making the article what it is today. --[[User:RexRacer|'''<font color="#E7CE6B">Rex</font>]][[User talk:RexRacer|<font color="#42528C ">Racer</font>''']] 18:34, 6 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
*Very good and well written! Definitely worthy! [[User:Mudkipluvr4ever|Mudkipluvr4ever]] 18:56, 6 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
*'''''Support!''''' Rex hit the nail on the head, it's very in depth and covers berries in all canon by a reasonable amount. Maybe [[Pokémon.com online games|Munchlax's Berry Bonanza]] and [[Swalot Plop]] could be given a mention. I could try writing something up on each if nobody else wants to. Besides that I think it meets the standard. And I'm assuming we're not looking to have ''every'' berry that appears in the anime included in the article? --'''<sup>[[user:Emp|Emp]], out</sup>''' 20:10, 6 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
*<s>'''Support'''. Very comprehensive, uses templates where it should, seems to have everything necessary. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 10:44, 13 February 2010 (UTC)</s> Vote changed to oppose. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 07:54, 23 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
*'''Support''' because Platinum won't get chosen. This is gonna be featured. <span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="background:#000000">[[User:Virtual-Z|<span style="color:#C0C0C0">'''Virtual-'''</span>]][[User_talk:Virtual-Z|<span style="color:#99FF00">'''Z'''</span>]]</span></span> 04:33, 5 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
====Object ( | ====Object (4)==== | ||
<!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.--> | <!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.--> | ||
* | * I think that there are better articles than this one that could be an FAC article. - [[User:Pokemon1234567890|Pokémon1234567890]] 19:49, 7 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
**How does this mean the article isn't good enough for FAC? [[User:Turtwig A|Turt]][[wig]] [[Turtwig (Pokémon)|A]] ([[User talk:Turtwig A|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Turtwig A|contribs]]) 21:51, 7 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
* '''Oppose.''' Needs work, image-wise. Also, it's another list for the most part. Bland to an extent... [[User:Ht14|<span style="color:#FF1111"><sup>'''''ht'''''</sup></span>]][[User talk:Ht14|<span style="color:#DAA520"><small>''14''</small></span>]] 05:38, 22 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
* '''Object'''. I voted for Support before the new table was introduced. I don't think a featured article should show missing images. When they are added, this article could be renominated. But for now, no. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 07:54, 23 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
* '''Object''' *fills in "All of the above"* [[User:CuboneKing|<font color="Red">Cu</font>]][[User talk:CuboneKing|<font color="Tan">bo</font>]][[Special:Contributions/CuboneKing|<font color="Green color light">ne</font>]][[Cubone (Pokémon)|<font color="Black">King</font>]] | |||
:I only put the images in so that I'd have a list of all the filenames I need to upload to so someone wouldn't screw it up. I've been far too busy to clean up and animate them all, though. '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#80964B">''TTE''</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#C4E673">chidna</span>]]''' 04:36, 5 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
====Other comments==== | ====Other comments==== | ||
Don't get me wrong, it's a good article; but, I think it's just good for the images. Speaking of which, the images have yet to be fully uploaded, so... [[User:Ht14|<span style="color:#FF1111"><sup>'''''ht'''''</sup></span>]][[User talk:Ht14|<span style="color:#DAA520"><small>''14''</small></span>]] 03:53, 16 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
:Shouldn't this be in oppose then? [[User:Turtwig A|Turt]][[wig]] [[Turtwig (Pokémon)|A]] ([[User talk:Turtwig A|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Turtwig A|contribs]]) 12:26, 16 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
::Point made. Changing to '''oppose'''. [[User:Ht14|<span style="color:#FF1111"><sup>'''''ht'''''</sup></span>]][[User talk:Ht14|<span style="color:#DAA520"><small>''14''</small></span>]] 05:37, 22 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:17, 6 March 2010
Berry
Support (4)
- Support A very comprehensive article with information on every stage in the history of berries, from Gen II to Gen IV. Aesthetically pleasing, it is evident that a lot of time and effort went in to making the article what it is today. --RexRacer 18:34, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Very good and well written! Definitely worthy! Mudkipluvr4ever 18:56, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support! Rex hit the nail on the head, it's very in depth and covers berries in all canon by a reasonable amount. Maybe Munchlax's Berry Bonanza and Swalot Plop could be given a mention. I could try writing something up on each if nobody else wants to. Besides that I think it meets the standard. And I'm assuming we're not looking to have every berry that appears in the anime included in the article? --Emp, out 20:10, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Support. Very comprehensive, uses templates where it should, seems to have everything necessary. --SnorlaxMonster 10:44, 13 February 2010 (UTC)Vote changed to oppose. --SnorlaxMonster 07:54, 23 February 2010 (UTC)- Support because Platinum won't get chosen. This is gonna be featured. Virtual-Z 04:33, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Object (4)
- I think that there are better articles than this one that could be an FAC article. - Pokémon1234567890 19:49, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose. Needs work, image-wise. Also, it's another list for the most part. Bland to an extent... ht14 05:38, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- Object. I voted for Support before the new table was introduced. I don't think a featured article should show missing images. When they are added, this article could be renominated. But for now, no. --SnorlaxMonster 07:54, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- Object *fills in "All of the above"* CuboneKing
- I only put the images in so that I'd have a list of all the filenames I need to upload to so someone wouldn't screw it up. I've been far too busy to clean up and animate them all, though. TTEchidna 04:36, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Other comments
Don't get me wrong, it's a good article; but, I think it's just good for the images. Speaking of which, the images have yet to be fully uploaded, so... ht14 03:53, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
