User talk:SnorlaxMonster/Pokémon Syntax: Difference between revisions
Nescientist (talk | contribs) (wiki maintenance) |
|||
(33 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) | |||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
:::::::No idea, but I would assume lowercase. It hasn't appeared in the games, the TCG is meaningless since it is both in a card title and at the start of a sentence, and I only have a DVD of one anime episode (Pokemon.com does work for this because DVDs have official subtitles) from AG and no manga, so I have no way of checking. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 11:04, 20 June 2012 (UTC) | :::::::No idea, but I would assume lowercase. It hasn't appeared in the games, the TCG is meaningless since it is both in a card title and at the start of a sentence, and I only have a DVD of one anime episode (Pokemon.com does work for this because DVDs have official subtitles) from AG and no manga, so I have no way of checking. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 11:04, 20 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
Ah well... Uhm could you explain me the hypenation a lil better ? You said in a previous discussion that " Correct usage would be "Snorlax is a Normal type" (used as a noun) or "Snorlax is Normal-type" (used as an adjective)." That means it applies to all adjectives not necessarily if they're standing next to a noun ? "Snorlax is Normal-type is the same with Snorlax is a Normal-type Poké" right ? That means that "Snorlax being a Normal-type is immune to the Ghost type", the first is hypenated while the last isn't ?--[[User:DJWolfy|<span style="color:Blue;">--'''DJ'''</span>]][[User talk:DJWolfy|<span style="color:Blue;">'''Wolfy'''</span>]] 12:09, 20 June 2012 (UTC) | Ah well... Uhm could you explain me the hypenation a lil better ? You said in a previous discussion that " Correct usage would be "Snorlax is a Normal type" (used as a noun) or "Snorlax is Normal-type" (used as an adjective)." That means it applies to all adjectives not necessarily if they're standing next to a noun ? "Snorlax is Normal-type is the same with Snorlax is a Normal-type Poké" right ? That means that "Snorlax being a Normal-type is immune to the Ghost type", the first is hypenated while the last isn't ?--[[User:DJWolfy|<span style="color:Blue;">--'''DJ'''</span>]][[User talk:DJWolfy|<span style="color:Blue;">'''Wolfy'''</span>]] 12:09, 20 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
:To answer the question about [[Aura]], yes, it is capitalized. See [http://www.pokemon.com/us/pokemon-movies/movie-pokemon-lucario-and-the-mystery-of-mew-2006/ here], [http://www.pokemon.com/us/tv-episodes/season-11/episode-29-11_29-pokemon-ranger-and-the-kidnapped-riolu-part-1/ here] and [http://www.pokemon.com/us/tv-episodes/season-11/episode-30-11_30-pokemon-ranger-and-the-kidnapped-riolu-part-2/ here]. And I have a question; anime-exclusive Trainer classes are capitalized? There is an inconsistency, [[Pokémon Connoisseur]] is, but [[Pokémon | :To answer the question about [[Aura]], yes, it is capitalized. See [http://www.pokemon.com/us/pokemon-movies/movie-pokemon-lucario-and-the-mystery-of-mew-2006/ here], [http://www.pokemon.com/us/tv-episodes/season-11/episode-29-11_29-pokemon-ranger-and-the-kidnapped-riolu-part-1/ here] and [http://www.pokemon.com/us/tv-episodes/season-11/episode-30-11_30-pokemon-ranger-and-the-kidnapped-riolu-part-2/ here]. And I have a question; anime-exclusive Trainer classes are capitalized? There is an inconsistency, [[Pokémon Connoisseur]] is, but [[Pokémon Watcher]] and [[Pokémon stylist]] are not.--[[User:Mikuri|Mikuri]] ([[User talk:Mikuri|talk]]) 13:14, 20 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
::Your hyphenation was all right except "Snorlax being a Normal type is immune to the Ghost type" is the correct hyphenation (although it still sounds weird and I would phrase it "Snorlax, being a Normal type, is immune to Ghost-type moves"). Anyway, if you're havng difficulty distinguishing if the phrase is being used as an adjective or noun, it is usually preceded by "a" or "the" when used as a noun (e.g. "Snorlax is a Normal type" and "The Normal type is the best type"); when used as an adjective, it is usually preceded by a verb, adverb, or adjective or proceeded by a noun (e.g. "Snorlax is Normal-type", "Normal-type Snorlax is weak to Fighting-type moves") | ::Your hyphenation was all right except "Snorlax being a Normal type is immune to the Ghost type" is the correct hyphenation (although it still sounds weird and I would phrase it "Snorlax, being a Normal type, is immune to Ghost-type moves"). Anyway, if you're havng difficulty distinguishing if the phrase is being used as an adjective or noun, it is usually preceded by "a" or "the" when used as a noun (e.g. "Snorlax is a Normal type" and "The Normal type is the best type"); when used as an adjective, it is usually preceded by a verb, adverb, or adjective or proceeded by a noun (e.g. "Snorlax is Normal-type", "Normal-type Snorlax is weak to Fighting-type moves") | ||
::I'd really like some reliable print source before we decide to make all anime Trainer classes capitalized (the current inconsistencies are not reassuring to the reliability of random books or Pokemon.com). I think we should go off manga, or failing that, subtitles if there is an inconsistency in print media (if it doesn't appear in the games). Aura and Stylist I'm happy with capitalizing based on Pokemon.com, however, because neither has conflicting sources. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 15:18, 20 June 2012 (UTC) | ::I'd really like some reliable print source before we decide to make all anime Trainer classes capitalized (the current inconsistencies are not reassuring to the reliability of random books or Pokemon.com). I think we should go off manga, or failing that, subtitles if there is an inconsistency in print media (if it doesn't appear in the games). Aura and Stylist I'm happy with capitalizing based on Pokemon.com, however, because neither has conflicting sources. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 15:18, 20 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
== Weather conditions? == | == Weather conditions? == | ||
[[Talk:Weather | [[Talk:Weather#Weather quotes|This discussion]] has several references to the description of weather within the games. My Prima guide capitalizes it: "The Hail weather will last in all the wild Pokémon battles from Route 216 to Snowpoint City." while the games vary on capitalization, leaning towards non-capitalization. --[[User:Abcboy|Abcboy]] ([[User talk:Abcboy|talk]]) 01:25, 22 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
:Games take priority over guidebooks. Games have them exclusively uncapitalized in the most recent appearances (older games are less consistent in syntax, and retcon means that new conventions take priority). --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 02:06, 22 November 2012 (UTC) | :Games take priority over guidebooks. Games have them exclusively uncapitalized in the most recent appearances (older games are less consistent in syntax, and retcon means that new conventions take priority). --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 02:06, 22 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
::Okay then. --[[User:Abcboy|Abcboy]] ([[User talk:Abcboy|talk]]) 02:49, 22 November 2012 (UTC) | ::Okay then. --[[User:Abcboy|Abcboy]] ([[User talk:Abcboy|talk]]) 02:49, 22 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
Line 167: | Line 167: | ||
Are starter Pokémon has to be always capitalized or uncapitalized? --[[User:Cinday123|<span style="color:pink">Cinday123</span>]] <small>''([[User talk:Cinday123|<span style="color:lightblue">Talk</span>]])''</small> 10:01, 2 April 2014 (UTC) | Are starter Pokémon has to be always capitalized or uncapitalized? --[[User:Cinday123|<span style="color:pink">Cinday123</span>]] <small>''([[User talk:Cinday123|<span style="color:lightblue">Talk</span>]])''</small> 10:01, 2 April 2014 (UTC) | ||
:It's not really an official term, so "starter" is not capitalized. It does appear [http://www.pokemon.com/us/pokemon-episodes/07_31-six-pack-attack/ here] and [http://www.pokemon.com/us/pokemon-episodes/chronicles-14-journey-to-the-starting-line/ here], but I really don't trust Pokémon.com episode summaries for that kind of thing because they very often contain errors. It may be the case that guidebooks capitalize it. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 10:39, 2 April 2014 (UTC) | :It's not really an official term, so "starter" is not capitalized. It does appear [http://www.pokemon.com/us/pokemon-episodes/07_31-six-pack-attack/ here] and [http://www.pokemon.com/us/pokemon-episodes/chronicles-14-journey-to-the-starting-line/ here], but I really don't trust Pokémon.com episode summaries for that kind of thing because they very often contain errors. It may be the case that guidebooks capitalize it. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 10:39, 2 April 2014 (UTC) | ||
== Evolution == | |||
Is the capitalization of evolution/Evolution a new thing as of XY? I ask because I can't remember it happening in any game other than as part of Mega Evolution (although my memory is very probably faulty) and our style has always been to lowercase it. Also, your note just says "derivative terms," but some changes have been reverted on the grounds that the games don't capitalize the verb form; exactly which derivative terms should and should not be capitalized, then? [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 00:54, 6 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
:The verb form is never capitalized so that should probably be made clear in the note. I haven't checked for anything besides Mega Evolution since that's a bit difficult. I feel like I've never even seen evolutionary besides in a fan context though. --[[User:Funktastic~!|<span style="color:#009900">'''It's'''</span> <span style="color:#CC66FF">'''Funktastic~!'''</span>]][[User talk:Funktastic~!|<sub><small><span style="color:#99CCFF">''話してください''</span></small></sub>]] 00:58, 6 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
::And I just checked in game. The verb form is never capitalized. Evolution is, and I still have no clue where to look to find out if 'evolutionary' is capitalized or not. --[[User:Funktastic~!|<span style="color:#009900">'''It's'''</span> <span style="color:#CC66FF">'''Funktastic~!'''</span>]][[User talk:Funktastic~!|<sub><small><span style="color:#99CCFF">''話してください''</span></small></sub>]] 01:02, 6 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::I have no idea where to find this out, either, but another question I have: is Evolution capitalized only in reference to the process, only in reference to evolutionary level (first, second, third, Mega), or both? (That is, if evolutionary levels appear in the games' text at all and aren't just a fan thing.) [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 01:04, 6 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
::::The quote I saw is "The Professor is researching Evolution and change," so it seems like it's just capitalized in general. --[[User:Funktastic~!|<span style="color:#009900">'''It's'''</span> <span style="color:#CC66FF">'''Funktastic~!'''</span>]][[User talk:Funktastic~!|<sub><small><span style="color:#99CCFF">''話してください''</span></small></sub>]] 01:08, 6 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::::Yeah, "Evolution" as a noun is capitalized. "Evolutionary" comes from the Eviolite's description. However, you are correct that "evolve" as a verb is not capitalized, so I'll just restrict it to specifically "Evolution" and "Evolutionary". --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 02:05, 6 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
::::::Also, I only have evidence of the concept "Evolution" being capitalized, not the stages such as "first evolution" etc., so leave those uncapitalized. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 02:10, 6 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
{{indent}}Now what about Evolutionary? Eviolite is using it as an adjective detailing the lump's relation to the concept of Evolution as a whole, but we commonly use it to detail a Pokémon's relation to its evolutions, as in "evolutionary family" and "evolutionary relatives". They shouldn't all be capitalized, should they? <small>[[User:Glik|glik]]</small><sup>[[User talk:Glik|glak]]</sup> 02:32, 6 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
:Because of the last edit for the Pokémon Syntax, if Evolution/evolution is a verb then leave it uncapitalized and if is a noun, it should be capitalized, right? --[[User:Cinday123|<span style="color:pink">Cinday123</span>]] <small>''([[User talk:Cinday123|<span style="color:lightblue">Talk</span>]])''</small> 02:42, 6 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::It's only capitalized when it's a noun and refers to the process itself, I believe. So "Raichu is an evolution of Pikachu" is correct while "A Thunderstone will induce Evolution in a Pikachu" is also correct. <small>[[User:Glik|glik]]</small><sup>[[User talk:Glik|glak]]</sup> 03:01, 6 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
::::Alright, I have to be careful while editing next time when I'm focusing on Evolutions/evolutions. --[[User:Cinday123|<span style="color:pink">Cinday123</span>]] <small>''([[User talk:Cinday123|<span style="color:lightblue">Talk</span>]])''</small> 03:07, 6 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::::Why do people keep talking about situations when "evolution" is used a a verb? It is always a noun; "evolve" ("evolves", "evolved", "evolving") is the verb. Anyway, I would say "Evolutionary family" should be capitalized, but I am unsure about it. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 03:24, 6 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
::::::Yes, that's what they're referring to; evolution and evolve are the same word inflected into different parts of speech, and by "derivative terms" you kind of confusingly implied that included alternate parts of speech, like the verb form. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 05:11, 6 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::::::Yeah, I realize I made a mistake and was overly broad in my last edit. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 05:29, 6 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
{{indent}}There was question above about "first evolution" and the like, and "evolutionary". I just caught an {{p|Eevee}} in Y and noticed that its Pokedex entry says "[Eevee] conceals many different possible '''evolutions'''." This suggests that the noun should only be capitalized when it refers to the process, ''not'' when it refers to a Pokemon that has undergone that process, like in "first evolution". When I looked at the Pokedex entries on Eevee's page, I also noticed that X's entry apparently says "different '''evolutionary''' forms". [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 20:14, 6 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
:In that case, I'm just going to remove "Evolutionary" from the page, because the situations where it is necessary to capitalize it are far too sparse. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 07:21, 7 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Plural names of Pokémon == | |||
In [[Generation I]], a girl next to [[Pewter Gym]] says "CLEFAIRYs" not "CLEFAIRY", and a man in [[Diglett's Cave]] states "DIGLETTs". Should this not be counted as an error in early episodes? I didn't know another place to put this... [[User:Pikachu Bros.|Pikachu Bros.]] <small>([[User talk:Pikachu Bros.|talk]])</small> 17:56, 7 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
:Also, there is inconsistency in use of American quotes and {{tt|logical|AKA British}} quotes. The first section uses American, while the rest use logical.{{unsigned|Pikachu Bros.|17:59, 7 April 2014 (UTC)}} | |||
::I believe that at Bulbapedia, we still recognize these early pluralizations with the ''s'' as errors, no matter how consistent they may seem. ''[[User:Maverick Nate|<sup style="color:#00008B;">'''Maverick'''</sup>]][[User talk:Maverick Nate|<sub style="color:#00008B;">'''Nate'''</sub>]]'' 19:51, 7 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::Yeah, we follow the most recent official grammatical standards, so even though older games occasionally had separate words for plurals of Pokémon names, Bulbapedia uses what all current official materials do (which is singular is the same as plural). As for quotes, as an Australian I tend to prefer the logical standard too, so I habitually put them that way, but they should be formatted the American way because that is how the games and Bulbapedia as a whole does it (as much as it pains me to do so). --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 05:17, 8 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Form/Forme and Zygarde == | |||
I have just a couple questions regarding Zygarde's page, as I recently made some substantial additions. | |||
Is "forme" always capitalized (Zygarde Complete Forme is the strongest of Zygarde's Formes.), or is it only capitalized when part of a Pokemon's name (Zygarde only enters Complete Forme when its other formes are outmatched.)? | |||
Further, are Zygarde's formes properly referred to as "Formes" or "forms"? ("While it does not evolve, Zygarde has five formes/Formes," or "While it does not evolve, Zygarde has five forms.") | |||
Going off of what I understand from the [[form differences]] page, I would assume that Forme is the correct terminology, but I'm unsure what exactly the difference between them is. Is Forme only used when referring to Legendary Pokémon, only when the stats of the Pokemon change, or both? [[User:Pacack| <span style="background:#000000"><span style="color:#ffe700">'''Pa'''ᗧ•••</span><span style="color:#0000FF">ᗣ'''ck'''</span> </span>]] 11:16, 25 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
:Forme is an official term for Pokémon who's alternate appearance is drastically different to its normal appearance (e.g. {{p|Giratina}}, {{p|Shaymin}}). Form is used to refer to Pokémon that just have minor differences in appearance (e.g. {{p|Arceus}}, {{p|Arbok}}). As for the capitalizing, it's only when you're referring to the forme should "Forme" be capitalized.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#AB2813">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#C87365">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#26649C">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#729ABF">ire</span>]] 12:00, 25 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
::Forme is mostly used for Legendary and Mythical Pokémon's alternate forms, although it is used for Aegislash but not Keldeo (and it is used for Cherrim, but only in Japanese/Korean and not English). Forme should always be capitalized (e.g. "Zygarde has 3 Formes"—Zygarde does not have 5 Formes, as the Core and Cell are not Formes). | |||
::Form is mostly used for non-Legendary/Mythical Pokémon such as Castform and Basculin, but it is also used for Keldeo (and it is used for Cherrim, but only in English and not Japanese/Korean). "Form" is handled like the word normally is in English (e.g. "Castform has 4 forms"). | |||
::As far as I can tell, the other game languages (French, German, Italian, Spanish) make no distinction between Forme and form. | |||
::I wouldn't even call the variations in Arbok "forms" (largely since the games don't recognize them as such). We list those on the [[Variant Pokémon]] page. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 14:45, 25 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
:::Okay, thanks. So, Formes should be capitalized in every scenario on Zygarde's page, and all the uses of the word "form" should be changed to "Forme". I'll get on that when I'm done with work today. | |||
:::Though, I am wondering; what should we consider Zygarde Cores and Cells? The beginning of the article currently states the following: | |||
:::"While it is not known to evolve into or from any other Pokémon, it has five forms." | |||
:::I know that we need to change the ending to, "it has three Formes," but I don't know what to classify the Cores and Cells as. Maybe, "it has three Formes and two basic units (or components), Zygarde Cores and Zygarde Cells, which arrange to create the three Formes." Does that sound acceptable? If so, does units or components sound better? | |||
:::Lastly, when referring to the different Formes (ie: Zygarde 10% Forme), should every instance of "10% Forme" be changed to "Zygarde 10% Forme", or is shortening it okay? I noticed the former naming method a few times in the article, and I don't know if it needs to be corrected.[[User:Pacack| <span style="background:#000000"><span style="color:#ffe700">'''Pa'''ᗧ•••</span><span style="color:#0000FF">ᗣ'''ck'''</span> </span>]] 17:26, 25 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
== Super-effective == | |||
It's spelled with a hyphen in English GSC ([https://github.com/iimarckus/iimarck.us/blob/master/dumps/dcrystal.txt#L15459 1], [https://github.com/iimarckus/iimarck.us/blob/master/dumps/dcrystal.txt#L26197 2]). [[User:SatoMew2|SatoMew2]] ([[User talk:SatoMew2|talk]]) 15:10, 25 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
:Fair point. Given the broader pool of usage, I'm going to put it in the same category as [[#Plural names of Pokémon|plural names of Pokémon]] in older games (i.e. just an error, and not reflective of current usage). --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 17:28, 25 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
== "Gender unknown" over "genderless" == | |||
Adapted from what I wrote a few months ago on [[Talk:Main Page/Archive 13]]: I'm pretty sure some person in some building in Unova or Kalos said something like "Pokémon have genders, like humans. They can be male, female, or even have unknown genders!" Also, Pokédex 3D Pro and the Pokédex on Pokemon.com use "unknown" under the gender field for Pokémon like Kyurem. That would suggest that "gender unknown" is a more official term than "genderless", and should be used instead. To be clear, I'm referring to gender (e.g., in the sentence "Cryogonal is the only genderless Pokémon, other than Mew, that can learn Attract."), not Egg Group. I'm not sure what the official way to use "gender unknown" in a sentence is though. Thoughts? [[Special:Contributions/Enervation|<span style="color:black">~</span>]][[User:Enervation|Enervation]] 20:43, 9 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
:I think you're probably right about the "Gender unknown" thing, but I'd rather avoid using it, because it gives the impression that ''we'' don't know but the information is out there, rather than that the games literally call it that. It's probably worth putting on the [[gender]] page though, and if you can establish a consensus on the talk page there that we should be using "Gender unknown" throughout the wiki despite the drawbacks, I'll likely change my stance about its inclusion here. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 02:49, 10 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
== Other things == | |||
Monster House is capitalized, except in Rescue Team. Also, RCB no longer falls under CamelCase. [[User:Eridanus|Eridanus]] ([[User talk:Eridanus|talk]]) 17:51, 12 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
== Watt == | |||
Watt and Watts are always capitalized in SwSh context. [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 08:25, 16 August 2020 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 10:09, 19 August 2023
Two additions
Are 'Browser' (as in the Fiore Browser) and 'Pokémon Storage System' collect capitalisations, or should they be lowercase? --Spriteit 03:59, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, I checked and it is Pokémon Storage System. I don't actually own any Ranger games, but I checked a video online and it is indeed Browser. --SnorlaxMonster 11:17, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Battles
If Double Battle, Triple Battle, etc. are capital, shouldn't the respective articles be moved asap to raise awareness? Take it from my example: I often base capitalization (when in doubt) to how it is in the article. -tc²₆tc26- 09:33, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- Ideally, a lot of things should be moved. They don't really need approval (apart from maybe changing disambig brackets because that's huge) because this is right and the other is wrong, but the reason I haven't done it yet is because there is a lot of relinking that will need to be done as a result. If you want to move Double Battle, Triple Battle, etc., go ahead, but I really don't like doing relinking (I'm generally trying to juggle a tonne of other things anyway). I've seen BulbaBot do relinking before (I'm pretty sure), so if we could get it automated, that would be amazing. --SnorlaxMonster 09:38, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Stat
how about stats such as Attack and Defense ? should they be capitalized ?----DJWolfy 09:51, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, they are capitalized in BW, and we go by the most recent main series games.--電禅Den Zen 10:01, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
How about ribbons ? Do they need capitalization ?----DJWolfy 14:15, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Contests ?----DJWolfy 20:10, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
How about "Single Battle" and "Symbol" ? ----DJWolfy 14:42, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
TCG
Could this be expanded to include TCG? A lot of terms are incorrectly interpreted within the fandom, and it would be nice to have a list of them somwhere, which this page would be great for. MaverickNate 15:53, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Mud and Bait
In-game (at least in SoulSilver) the 'mud' and 'bait' (as used in Safari Zone games) are capitalized in-game. (in NPC conversations) Is this sufficient reason to capitalize those terms (as they relate to usage in the Safari Zone) on Bulbapedia? Steph 20:09, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Other
I've seen that starter is not capitalized and therefore should be added to the list. How about Contest pass and Contest hall ?----DJWolfy 14:29, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
- The reason I don't ave starter on the list is that I don't believe it is an official term. Since it is unofficial, it is lowercase by default. I want to keep this list restricted to official terms only. Contest Hall is covered by locations and Contest Pass by items. --SnorlaxMonster 14:36, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Uhm, shouldn't it be specified what kind of Eggs, Fossils, Symbols and such should be capitalized ? New users might think that not only Frontier Symbols should be capitalized. The same for Pokémon Eggs and Fossils.----DJWolfy 18:00, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
- Also, how about the name of the series ? ----DJWolfy 19:24, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
But why don't the original series get capitalization ?----DJWolfy 15:15, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
When exactly do words use "the" and don't use "the". An example here and here. Also, how about "Cave of Origin" ? What does that use ?----DJWolfy 16:22, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- Also, how about level and gender ? ----DJWolfy 16:37, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- Bulleted points (when they're not sentences) and sections work like article titles. So while in a sentence you would always write "the Wallace Cup", in the article title it is merely called "Wallace Cup". --SnorlaxMonster 11:22, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Move Tutor
In-game (in SoulSilver, on a sign in Blackthorn City) and several times on Pokémon.com, 'move tutor' is capitalized as 'Move Tutor'. However, Bulbapedia consistently spells the term as 'move tutor.' Is the evidence for capitalization of the term sufficient to overturn the Bulbapedia convention? Steph (talk) 15:28, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
- The sign in Blackthorn City and the map description of Driftveil City do not mean anything, as all words are capitalized in those media regardless of whether they should be usually or not (both are followed by a capital "House"). However, since both Pokémon.com and Prima guidebooks use Move Tutor, I believe that it is fair to say that it should be capitalized (at least until we get it used in in-game in a sentence). --SnorlaxMonster 13:40, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Stuff
How about this ? Do none of them get "the" or just some ? Also, what does Cave of Origin get ? Do "level" and "gender" need capitalization ?----DJWolfy 12:03, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- Oh, just now I've seen that you replied above... Sorry.----DJWolfy 12:04, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- I would think that many of them would use "the" in sentences, but in a list like that they shouldn't. I've got a lot of catching up to do right now, so I don't have time to watch a bunch of PMD LPs to work out whether each location uses "the" or not right now (I'm not restarting my games just for that purpose). You're welcome to investigate yourself, if you would like. --SnorlaxMonster 12:10, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- I'll pass, got a lot of other stuff to edit. Btw, how long will it take for this page to be mainspaced ?----DJWolfy 12:16, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- Probably when the rest of the MoS gets finished, since I'm essentially breaking off part of it (honestly I started this because I saw people warring over the useage of "the" a few times and checked what it should have been, but I kept forgetting and needing to check again so this page just compiled the list of them). --SnorlaxMonster 12:18, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- I'll pass, got a lot of other stuff to edit. Btw, how long will it take for this page to be mainspaced ?----DJWolfy 12:16, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- I would think that many of them would use "the" in sentences, but in a list like that they shouldn't. I've got a lot of catching up to do right now, so I don't have time to watch a bunch of PMD LPs to work out whether each location uses "the" or not right now (I'm not restarting my games just for that purpose). You're welcome to investigate yourself, if you would like. --SnorlaxMonster 12:10, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
How about cosplay ? Is it capitalized ?----DJWolfy 12:58, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
How about aura ? ----DJWolfy 10:50, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- No idea, but I would assume lowercase. It hasn't appeared in the games, the TCG is meaningless since it is both in a card title and at the start of a sentence, and I only have a DVD of one anime episode (Pokemon.com does work for this because DVDs have official subtitles) from AG and no manga, so I have no way of checking. --SnorlaxMonster 11:04, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Ah well... Uhm could you explain me the hypenation a lil better ? You said in a previous discussion that " Correct usage would be "Snorlax is a Normal type" (used as a noun) or "Snorlax is Normal-type" (used as an adjective)." That means it applies to all adjectives not necessarily if they're standing next to a noun ? "Snorlax is Normal-type is the same with Snorlax is a Normal-type Poké" right ? That means that "Snorlax being a Normal-type is immune to the Ghost type", the first is hypenated while the last isn't ?----DJWolfy 12:09, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- To answer the question about Aura, yes, it is capitalized. See here, here and here. And I have a question; anime-exclusive Trainer classes are capitalized? There is an inconsistency, Pokémon Connoisseur is, but Pokémon Watcher and Pokémon stylist are not.--Mikuri (talk) 13:14, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- Your hyphenation was all right except "Snorlax being a Normal type is immune to the Ghost type" is the correct hyphenation (although it still sounds weird and I would phrase it "Snorlax, being a Normal type, is immune to Ghost-type moves"). Anyway, if you're havng difficulty distinguishing if the phrase is being used as an adjective or noun, it is usually preceded by "a" or "the" when used as a noun (e.g. "Snorlax is a Normal type" and "The Normal type is the best type"); when used as an adjective, it is usually preceded by a verb, adverb, or adjective or proceeded by a noun (e.g. "Snorlax is Normal-type", "Normal-type Snorlax is weak to Fighting-type moves")
- I'd really like some reliable print source before we decide to make all anime Trainer classes capitalized (the current inconsistencies are not reassuring to the reliability of random books or Pokemon.com). I think we should go off manga, or failing that, subtitles if there is an inconsistency in print media (if it doesn't appear in the games). Aura and Stylist I'm happy with capitalizing based on Pokemon.com, however, because neither has conflicting sources. --SnorlaxMonster 15:18, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Then I guess you should add them to the list.----DJWolfy 16:03, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Team Rocket
Should I correct instances of "Team Rocket (Jessie, James, and Meowth, not the organization itself) made their appearance" to "Team Rocket made its appearance"? (For context, see http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Steph&redirect=no#TRT)Steph (talk) 21:56, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Lv.
Is "Lv." as in "Lv. 80 Arceus" capitalized? On a side note, super effective doesn't seem like a noun. I think you should also mention Route 34 and ashigatana/Ashigatana. On another side note, can you explain why anime episodes are italicized? I always thought they were to be put in quotation marks. ~Enervation 00:14, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
- I believe Lv. is, but it shouldn't be written that way on Bulbapedia anyway. Yeah, you're right and I've tried to rephrase it to be correct. Ashigatana is a Japanese word romanized, not an English name, so we don't know whether it should or shouldn't be capitalized; however, it would appear that the day after you posted this message we got its English name from Pokédex 3D Pro, "seamitar", which is apparently uncapitalized. I believe they should be, but Bulbapedia opted to use italics a long time ago; quotation marks would certainly make more sense for "If the Scarf Fits, Wear It!", however. --SnorlaxMonster 03:08, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
Scalchops, Stylers, and Preferred Tense
Should "scalchop" be capitalized or uncapitalized? Since it's not worth making another talk topic over, what about "styler"? (as in "capture styler") In addition, what is the preferred tense (at least episode synopsis-wise) in Bulbapedia's articles? (for example, which is preferred: "Meowth grabbed Pikachu with the grabbing device" or "Meowth grabs Pikachu with the grabbing device"? Steph (talk) 23:45, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
- Scalchop is already on the page (it was added on June 18); it is uncapitalized. Styler should be capitalized, as should Capture Styler. Tense in episodes I'm not sure of, but would belong on the anime MoS, not here, because this page is about official syntax while episode synopsis tense is a stylistic choice. Ask Kenji-girl about it; it needs to be on the anime MoS. --SnorlaxMonster 13:03, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Bicycles, Pokégear, Pester Ball
Should "bicycle" (as it pertains to the games) be capitalized? It is capitalized on its page, but inconsistently. The term "Pokégear" is referred to with and without camel case. ('PokéGear' being the camel case equivalent) Which is the correct case? Pester balls, used in Pokémon Snap, appear to be regular Poké Balls. (which are capitalized) However, they are not actually Poké Balls. 'Pester Ball' is capitalized on its page----should it be capitalized? Steph (talk) 19:18, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- Bicycle should be, and is already covered being an item name. Pokégear was camelcase in a TCG card released in Genereation II, but HGSS and the new Pokégear card have fixed it and it is officially not camelcase (I'll add it to the page). Pester Ball is only written in allcaps in-game as far as I can tell from videos, so it should be capitalized. --SnorlaxMonster 08:46, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- So "bicycle" should never be used generically? More words/phrases: lake trio, the Underground, movie, lookalike item, physical move, Shadow Sky (and other weather), substitute (the actual doll), and levitating. Should <sc> ever be used? Should "Contest Properties" on type pages be changed to "Contest properties"? ~Enervation 00:43, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
- You could argue that outside of the games it could, but I think for consistency and lack of evidence indicating otherwise, Bicycle should be always be capitalized. Lake trio and lake guardians were both used in the anime (the same episode even), but without subtitles I can't say if they should be capitalized, but for now no. Underground has now been added. I'd like to wait for the English release for making a judgement on B2W2 terms. Lookalike Item is capitalized (as is Exclusive Item). Shadow Sky... I've never played Colo or XD, but from looking at videos, that's probably not the best name for the weather condition; it looks like "shadowy aura" would be a better name. "Status" in the description of Prankster is lowercase, so I would say that physical and special should be too (there's probably a better source for this, but I'm not sure where to look). The substitute doll is lowercase (and I have now added it to the page). Based on the description of the Iron Ball, levitating is lowercase, but it's not really an official term anyway. <sc> should be used when quoting the games and they use ALLCAPS. This is much more common in older games, and you will see it used in Pokédex entries, and move, item, and Ability descriptions. "Contest Properties" should be changed to "Contest properties". --SnorlaxMonster 11:51, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
- So "bicycle" should never be used generically? More words/phrases: lake trio, the Underground, movie, lookalike item, physical move, Shadow Sky (and other weather), substitute (the actual doll), and levitating. Should <sc> ever be used? Should "Contest Properties" on type pages be changed to "Contest properties"? ~Enervation 00:43, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Weather conditions?
This discussion has several references to the description of weather within the games. My Prima guide capitalizes it: "The Hail weather will last in all the wild Pokémon battles from Route 216 to Snowpoint City." while the games vary on capitalization, leaning towards non-capitalization. --Abcboy (talk) 01:25, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
- Games take priority over guidebooks. Games have them exclusively uncapitalized in the most recent appearances (older games are less consistent in syntax, and retcon means that new conventions take priority). --SnorlaxMonster 02:06, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
Conquest capitalization
About your request at my talk page, I've done a lot of Pokémon Conquest capitalization on the site, which may be good to have on this page. I'll list some of it here, deliberately excluding the many battlefield features, which can be found in the kingdom articles, correctly capitalized.
Uncapitalized
- link
- kingdom
- ponigiri (not the item)
- red ponigiri (the Ponigiri Shop service, not the item)
- blue ponigiri (the Ponigiri Shop service, not the item)
- move rank
- story
- army
- castle
- month
- recruit
- equip
- <kingdom weather conditions>
Capitalized
- Perfect Link
- Energy
- Range
- Warrior
- Warlord
- Warrior Skill
- Ponigiri (the item, not the Ponigiri Shop service or otherwise)
- Red Ponigiri (the item, not the Ponigiri Shop service)
- Blue Ponigiri (the item, not the Ponigiri Shop service)
Yvnr (talk) 16:10, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
- Are you sure you have your Ponigiri around the right way, because it contradicts your edit here. I haven't played Conquest, so I'm relying on you. I'm not sure how important some of those words you had there are (e.g. month) so I haven't added them all. --SnorlaxMonster 07:06, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
- I listed the Ponigiri Shop services (not the items) as uncapitalized, and in the edit you're linking to, I changed various Ponigiri Shop services (not the items) from upper to lower case. How is that a contradiction? All the words I listed are central terms in the game, so it's your call what to include or not (some could be considered self-explanatory), although I would say I disagree on the exclusion of "move rank". Yvnr (talk) 14:26, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
- I'll add move rank then. In that edit it looks to me like you changed item names to lowercase; I understood the service as selling Ponigiri, and "only the ponigiri is sold" appears to be talking about the item. I typically excluded things if they didn't have their own articles; if they are important concepts they typically do. --SnorlaxMonster 14:58, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
- Well, that's not the case - those are the Ponigiri Shop services, bought and instantly consumed - not items, not capitalized. The items, which can be kept and equipped for usage in battle, can be bought from Shops, as opposed to Ponigiri Shops. I'm elaborating on this misunderstanding because the information is still hidetagged on your page. Also, I'd suggest rephrasing to emphasize a few points that are currently missing; the word ponigiri is never capitalized, except when appearing in the name of the Ponigiri Shop kingdom utility or the items Ponigiri, Red Ponigiri, Blue Ponigiri, and Purple Ponigiri. Ponigiri is not capitalized in the names of the Ponigiri Shop services ponigiri, red ponigiri, and blue ponigiri. Yvnr (talk) 18:14, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
- Ah, okay, that makes sense then. This is one of the problems I come across when trying to do this for games I haven't played. --SnorlaxMonster 13:13, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry to nitpick, but your wording in the special case of ponigiri misses the point that ponigiri is a term itself. While it currently reads:
- The items Ponigiri, Red Ponigiri, Blue Ponigiri, and Purple Ponigiri (which are stored in the player's inventory) are always capitalized, as is Ponigiri Shop. However, the shop services (which can be purchased at Ponigiri Shops) are uncapitalized.
- The following would offer a full explanation:
- Ponigiri is not a capitalized term. However, that does not mean it is exempted from capitalization when appearing in titles that are capitalized. This is the case with Pokémon Conquest kingdom locations (i.e. Ponigiri Shop) and items (i.e. Ponigiri, Red Ponigiri, Blue Ponigiri, and Purple Ponigiri), but not with the services available at Ponigiri Shops (i.e. ponigiri, red ponigiri, and blue ponigiri). Yvnr (talk) 17:02, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry to nitpick, but your wording in the special case of ponigiri misses the point that ponigiri is a term itself. While it currently reads:
- Ah, okay, that makes sense then. This is one of the problems I come across when trying to do this for games I haven't played. --SnorlaxMonster 13:13, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
- Well, that's not the case - those are the Ponigiri Shop services, bought and instantly consumed - not items, not capitalized. The items, which can be kept and equipped for usage in battle, can be bought from Shops, as opposed to Ponigiri Shops. I'm elaborating on this misunderstanding because the information is still hidetagged on your page. Also, I'd suggest rephrasing to emphasize a few points that are currently missing; the word ponigiri is never capitalized, except when appearing in the name of the Ponigiri Shop kingdom utility or the items Ponigiri, Red Ponigiri, Blue Ponigiri, and Purple Ponigiri. Ponigiri is not capitalized in the names of the Ponigiri Shop services ponigiri, red ponigiri, and blue ponigiri. Yvnr (talk) 18:14, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
- I'll add move rank then. In that edit it looks to me like you changed item names to lowercase; I understood the service as selling Ponigiri, and "only the ponigiri is sold" appears to be talking about the item. I typically excluded things if they didn't have their own articles; if they are important concepts they typically do. --SnorlaxMonster 14:58, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
- I listed the Ponigiri Shop services (not the items) as uncapitalized, and in the edit you're linking to, I changed various Ponigiri Shop services (not the items) from upper to lower case. How is that a contradiction? All the words I listed are central terms in the game, so it's your call what to include or not (some could be considered self-explanatory), although I would say I disagree on the exclusion of "move rank". Yvnr (talk) 14:26, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
Supereffective
Also, it seems that more recent games prefer "a supereffective move is a move that is super effective" over "a super-effective move is a move that is super effective", so you may want to consider that. Yvnr (talk) 16:10, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
- I had noticed that a while ago and meant to add it to the page, but never got around to. I've added it now. --SnorlaxMonster 07:06, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
I have a question
I'm a little confused about some of the names of places that require the use of "the" before it. I agree with most of them, but I refer to Slowpoke Well, Sky Pillar, Eterna Forest, Spear Pillar, and Snowpoint Temple without using "the" first (maybe Skyarrow Bridge as well?). It sounds more natural to me; they're names of specific places. Doesn't the sentence "I went to Sky Pillar" or "I entered Eterna Forest" make more sense than "I went to the Sky Pillar" or "I entered the Eterna Forest"? Admittedly, Sky Pillar could go either way, but I don't think the other four should have "the" used before them. AGGRON989 10:18, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
- Just so you know, this isn't conjecture, this is they way they are officially referred to. The problem is you're viewing them in the wrong way; the Spear Pillar and Sky Pillar are the pillar of the sky and the spear-shaped pillar, respectively, not just something named "Sky Pillar". The Eterna Forest and the Snowpoint Temple work in the same way as "the Snowpoint Pokémon Center". Similar logic can be applied to your other objections. --SnorlaxMonster 05:25, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
CamelCase
You should note that the DeepSea items CamelCase isn't present in Mystery Dungeon (at least Rescue and Explorers). Marked +-+-+ (talk) 10:53, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Baby Pokémon
Is the group name Baby Pokémon always capitalized or not capitalized? --Cinday123 (Talk) 22:46, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- From Crystal and HeartGold text dumps, it's "baby Pokémon". Unless there's some example in B2W2 onward of it capitalized, it's not (I couldn't find any in BW). --SnorlaxMonster 09:18, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Starter Pokémon
Are starter Pokémon has to be always capitalized or uncapitalized? --Cinday123 (Talk) 10:01, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- It's not really an official term, so "starter" is not capitalized. It does appear here and here, but I really don't trust Pokémon.com episode summaries for that kind of thing because they very often contain errors. It may be the case that guidebooks capitalize it. --SnorlaxMonster 10:39, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Evolution
Is the capitalization of evolution/Evolution a new thing as of XY? I ask because I can't remember it happening in any game other than as part of Mega Evolution (although my memory is very probably faulty) and our style has always been to lowercase it. Also, your note just says "derivative terms," but some changes have been reverted on the grounds that the games don't capitalize the verb form; exactly which derivative terms should and should not be capitalized, then? Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 00:54, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- The verb form is never capitalized so that should probably be made clear in the note. I haven't checked for anything besides Mega Evolution since that's a bit difficult. I feel like I've never even seen evolutionary besides in a fan context though. --It's Funktastic~!話してください 00:58, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- And I just checked in game. The verb form is never capitalized. Evolution is, and I still have no clue where to look to find out if 'evolutionary' is capitalized or not. --It's Funktastic~!話してください 01:02, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- I have no idea where to find this out, either, but another question I have: is Evolution capitalized only in reference to the process, only in reference to evolutionary level (first, second, third, Mega), or both? (That is, if evolutionary levels appear in the games' text at all and aren't just a fan thing.) Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 01:04, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- The quote I saw is "The Professor is researching Evolution and change," so it seems like it's just capitalized in general. --It's Funktastic~!話してください 01:08, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- I have no idea where to find this out, either, but another question I have: is Evolution capitalized only in reference to the process, only in reference to evolutionary level (first, second, third, Mega), or both? (That is, if evolutionary levels appear in the games' text at all and aren't just a fan thing.) Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 01:04, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- And I just checked in game. The verb form is never capitalized. Evolution is, and I still have no clue where to look to find out if 'evolutionary' is capitalized or not. --It's Funktastic~!話してください 01:02, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
(resetting indent)Now what about Evolutionary? Eviolite is using it as an adjective detailing the lump's relation to the concept of Evolution as a whole, but we commonly use it to detail a Pokémon's relation to its evolutions, as in "evolutionary family" and "evolutionary relatives". They shouldn't all be capitalized, should they? glikglak 02:32, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- Because of the last edit for the Pokémon Syntax, if Evolution/evolution is a verb then leave it uncapitalized and if is a noun, it should be capitalized, right? --Cinday123 (Talk) 02:42, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- It's only capitalized when it's a noun and refers to the process itself, I believe. So "Raichu is an evolution of Pikachu" is correct while "A Thunderstone will induce Evolution in a Pikachu" is also correct. glikglak 03:01, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- Alright, I have to be careful while editing next time when I'm focusing on Evolutions/evolutions. --Cinday123 (Talk) 03:07, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- Why do people keep talking about situations when "evolution" is used a a verb? It is always a noun; "evolve" ("evolves", "evolved", "evolving") is the verb. Anyway, I would say "Evolutionary family" should be capitalized, but I am unsure about it. --SnorlaxMonster 03:24, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, that's what they're referring to; evolution and evolve are the same word inflected into different parts of speech, and by "derivative terms" you kind of confusingly implied that included alternate parts of speech, like the verb form. Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 05:11, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- Why do people keep talking about situations when "evolution" is used a a verb? It is always a noun; "evolve" ("evolves", "evolved", "evolving") is the verb. Anyway, I would say "Evolutionary family" should be capitalized, but I am unsure about it. --SnorlaxMonster 03:24, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- Alright, I have to be careful while editing next time when I'm focusing on Evolutions/evolutions. --Cinday123 (Talk) 03:07, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- It's only capitalized when it's a noun and refers to the process itself, I believe. So "Raichu is an evolution of Pikachu" is correct while "A Thunderstone will induce Evolution in a Pikachu" is also correct. glikglak 03:01, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
(resetting indent)There was question above about "first evolution" and the like, and "evolutionary". I just caught an Eevee in Y and noticed that its Pokedex entry says "[Eevee] conceals many different possible evolutions." This suggests that the noun should only be capitalized when it refers to the process, not when it refers to a Pokemon that has undergone that process, like in "first evolution". When I looked at the Pokedex entries on Eevee's page, I also noticed that X's entry apparently says "different evolutionary forms". Tiddlywinks (talk) 20:14, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- In that case, I'm just going to remove "Evolutionary" from the page, because the situations where it is necessary to capitalize it are far too sparse. --SnorlaxMonster 07:21, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Plural names of Pokémon
In Generation I, a girl next to Pewter Gym says "CLEFAIRYs" not "CLEFAIRY", and a man in Diglett's Cave states "DIGLETTs". Should this not be counted as an error in early episodes? I didn't know another place to put this... Pikachu Bros. (talk) 17:56, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- Also, there is inconsistency in use of American quotes and logical quotes. The first section uses American, while the rest use logical.- unsigned comment from Pikachu Bros. (talk • contribs) 17:59, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- I believe that at Bulbapedia, we still recognize these early pluralizations with the s as errors, no matter how consistent they may seem. MaverickNate 19:51, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah, we follow the most recent official grammatical standards, so even though older games occasionally had separate words for plurals of Pokémon names, Bulbapedia uses what all current official materials do (which is singular is the same as plural). As for quotes, as an Australian I tend to prefer the logical standard too, so I habitually put them that way, but they should be formatted the American way because that is how the games and Bulbapedia as a whole does it (as much as it pains me to do so). --SnorlaxMonster 05:17, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- I believe that at Bulbapedia, we still recognize these early pluralizations with the s as errors, no matter how consistent they may seem. MaverickNate 19:51, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Form/Forme and Zygarde
I have just a couple questions regarding Zygarde's page, as I recently made some substantial additions.
Is "forme" always capitalized (Zygarde Complete Forme is the strongest of Zygarde's Formes.), or is it only capitalized when part of a Pokemon's name (Zygarde only enters Complete Forme when its other formes are outmatched.)?
Further, are Zygarde's formes properly referred to as "Formes" or "forms"? ("While it does not evolve, Zygarde has five formes/Formes," or "While it does not evolve, Zygarde has five forms.")
Going off of what I understand from the form differences page, I would assume that Forme is the correct terminology, but I'm unsure what exactly the difference between them is. Is Forme only used when referring to Legendary Pokémon, only when the stats of the Pokemon change, or both? Paᗧ•••ᗣck 11:16, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- Forme is an official term for Pokémon who's alternate appearance is drastically different to its normal appearance (e.g. Giratina, Shaymin). Form is used to refer to Pokémon that just have minor differences in appearance (e.g. Arceus, Arbok). As for the capitalizing, it's only when you're referring to the forme should "Forme" be capitalized.--ForceFire 12:00, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- Forme is mostly used for Legendary and Mythical Pokémon's alternate forms, although it is used for Aegislash but not Keldeo (and it is used for Cherrim, but only in Japanese/Korean and not English). Forme should always be capitalized (e.g. "Zygarde has 3 Formes"—Zygarde does not have 5 Formes, as the Core and Cell are not Formes).
- Form is mostly used for non-Legendary/Mythical Pokémon such as Castform and Basculin, but it is also used for Keldeo (and it is used for Cherrim, but only in English and not Japanese/Korean). "Form" is handled like the word normally is in English (e.g. "Castform has 4 forms").
- As far as I can tell, the other game languages (French, German, Italian, Spanish) make no distinction between Forme and form.
- I wouldn't even call the variations in Arbok "forms" (largely since the games don't recognize them as such). We list those on the Variant Pokémon page. --SnorlaxMonster 14:45, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks. So, Formes should be capitalized in every scenario on Zygarde's page, and all the uses of the word "form" should be changed to "Forme". I'll get on that when I'm done with work today.
- Though, I am wondering; what should we consider Zygarde Cores and Cells? The beginning of the article currently states the following:
- "While it is not known to evolve into or from any other Pokémon, it has five forms."
- I know that we need to change the ending to, "it has three Formes," but I don't know what to classify the Cores and Cells as. Maybe, "it has three Formes and two basic units (or components), Zygarde Cores and Zygarde Cells, which arrange to create the three Formes." Does that sound acceptable? If so, does units or components sound better?
- Lastly, when referring to the different Formes (ie: Zygarde 10% Forme), should every instance of "10% Forme" be changed to "Zygarde 10% Forme", or is shortening it okay? I noticed the former naming method a few times in the article, and I don't know if it needs to be corrected. Paᗧ•••ᗣck 17:26, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Super-effective
It's spelled with a hyphen in English GSC (1, 2). SatoMew2 (talk) 15:10, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- Fair point. Given the broader pool of usage, I'm going to put it in the same category as plural names of Pokémon in older games (i.e. just an error, and not reflective of current usage). --SnorlaxMonster 17:28, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
"Gender unknown" over "genderless"
Adapted from what I wrote a few months ago on Talk:Main Page/Archive 13: I'm pretty sure some person in some building in Unova or Kalos said something like "Pokémon have genders, like humans. They can be male, female, or even have unknown genders!" Also, Pokédex 3D Pro and the Pokédex on Pokemon.com use "unknown" under the gender field for Pokémon like Kyurem. That would suggest that "gender unknown" is a more official term than "genderless", and should be used instead. To be clear, I'm referring to gender (e.g., in the sentence "Cryogonal is the only genderless Pokémon, other than Mew, that can learn Attract."), not Egg Group. I'm not sure what the official way to use "gender unknown" in a sentence is though. Thoughts? ~Enervation 20:43, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- I think you're probably right about the "Gender unknown" thing, but I'd rather avoid using it, because it gives the impression that we don't know but the information is out there, rather than that the games literally call it that. It's probably worth putting on the gender page though, and if you can establish a consensus on the talk page there that we should be using "Gender unknown" throughout the wiki despite the drawbacks, I'll likely change my stance about its inclusion here. --SnorlaxMonster 02:49, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Other things
Monster House is capitalized, except in Rescue Team. Also, RCB no longer falls under CamelCase. Eridanus (talk) 17:51, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Watt
Watt and Watts are always capitalized in SwSh context. Nescientist (talk) 08:25, 16 August 2020 (UTC)