Template talk:Indent: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
Force Fire (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Why do we have this? It has always worked. The accepted practice was... | Why do we have this? It has always worked. The accepted practice was... | ||
:1 line | :1 line | ||
| Line 23: | Line 22: | ||
==Redundancy== | ==Redundancy== | ||
I am thinking that this template is being redundant, because it is easy to type <code><nowiki><small>(resetting indent)</small></nowiki></code> (the code of this template). Yeah, typing {{template|indent}} may save bytes than typing the whole code, but it is still redundant. I am thinking of this being deleted or making this a substitution template. [[Cyndaquil|'''★''']]<span style="border:2px solid #FF0000; font-family:Verdana; text-decoration: blink">[[User:Pokéfan95|'''<span style="color:#28B6FF">Poké</span>''']][[User talk:Pokéfan95|'''<sup><span style="color:green">95</span></sup>''']]</span> 12:47, 31 July 2015 (UTC) | I am thinking that this template is being redundant, because it is easy to type <code><nowiki><small>(resetting indent)</small></nowiki></code> (the code of this template). Yeah, typing {{template|indent}} may save bytes than typing the whole code, but it is still redundant. I am thinking of this being deleted or making this a substitution template. [[Cyndaquil|'''★''']]<span style="border:2px solid #FF0000; font-family:Verdana; text-decoration: blink">[[User:Pokéfan95|'''<span style="color:#28B6FF">Poké</span>''']][[User talk:Pokéfan95|'''<sup><span style="color:green">95</span></sup>''']]</span> 12:47, 31 July 2015 (UTC) | ||
== Protection? == | |||
It seems strange to me that this template, used all over the wiki, isn't protected. Is there a reason for this? If not, I'd recommend protecting it. --[[User:Felthry|Felthry]] ([[User talk:Felthry|talk]]) 18:01, 27 February 2017 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:34, 26 January 2022
Why do we have this? It has always worked. The accepted practice was...
- 1 line
- two
- three
- four
- five
- six
- seven
- eight
- nine
- ten
- nine
- eight
- seven
- six
- five
- four
- three
- two
- eleven starts over at one. We don't need a warning for it, and it is not what we are supposed to do. What I demonstrated above is what we are supposed to do. MaverickNate 00:14, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- There is no rule as to how indenting works. After 7 indents, I start over with no indents because that's my preference. Therefore, this template is useful for me. Chocolate((Talk to Me|Look at My Contributions)) 00:15, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Protection
Can someone please protect this template? --Cinday123 (Talk) 03:08, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Redundancy
I am thinking that this template is being redundant, because it is easy to type <small>(resetting indent)</small> (the code of this template). Yeah, typing {{indent}} may save bytes than typing the whole code, but it is still redundant. I am thinking of this being deleted or making this a substitution template. ★Poké95 12:47, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Protection?
It seems strange to me that this template, used all over the wiki, isn't protected. Is there a reason for this? If not, I'd recommend protecting it. --Felthry (talk) 18:01, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
