Talk:Pokémon V (TCG): Difference between revisions
(→Split: new section) |
Nescientist (talk | contribs) (→Split) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Split == | == Split == | ||
I like categories. As it happens, V-UNION marks the 3rd stage involving "incomplete" cards (not a official grouping , but they follow identical setups of "most of this card doesn't actually start existing until it enters play, and they cannot be snuck into play otherwise due to lacking key components".) Ergo, we should have a category. Unfortunately, this article doesn't much like the idea, since it's srunched up with all the other V-likes. There's also the fact it's running on the long side anyway. Sure, it's only 4 list, but those are 4 long lists. Pop them all apart, do the restating game for each article, and let the category exist. [[User:Salmancer|Salmancer]] ([[User talk:Salmancer|talk]]) 01:52, 27 May 2024 (UTC) | I like categories. As it happens, V-UNION marks the 3rd stage involving "incomplete" cards (not a official grouping , but they follow identical setups of "most of this card doesn't actually start existing until it enters play, and they cannot be snuck into play otherwise due to lacking key components".) Ergo, we should have a category. Unfortunately, this article doesn't much like the idea, since it's srunched up with all the other V-likes. There's also the fact it's running on the long side anyway. Sure, it's only 4 list, but those are 4 long lists. Pop them all apart, do the restating game for each article, and let the category exist. [[User:Salmancer|Salmancer]] ([[User talk:Salmancer|talk]]) 01:52, 27 May 2024 (UTC | ||
It may help to bring up that this is somehow the 43rd longest page on the wiki, according to [[Special:LongPages]]. It's not even all that detailed. (It's the lists, I'm telling you). Allowing the stages to take off onto their own page would get this page down to the 300th or so place it should be at. [[User:Salmancer|Salmancer]] ([[User talk:Salmancer|talk]]) 07:02, 29 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
: Can't you add the category on the redirect? [[User:Pipefan|Pipefan]] ([[User talk:Pipefan|talk]]) 09:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Is this section supposed to be justifying the proposed split? (Because if it is, I genuinely can't see it.) [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 18:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:17, 29 May 2024
should we mention that vstar is pretty much the same thing as gx
Split
I like categories. As it happens, V-UNION marks the 3rd stage involving "incomplete" cards (not a official grouping , but they follow identical setups of "most of this card doesn't actually start existing until it enters play, and they cannot be snuck into play otherwise due to lacking key components".) Ergo, we should have a category. Unfortunately, this article doesn't much like the idea, since it's srunched up with all the other V-likes. There's also the fact it's running on the long side anyway. Sure, it's only 4 list, but those are 4 long lists. Pop them all apart, do the restating game for each article, and let the category exist. Salmancer (talk) 01:52, 27 May 2024 (UTC
It may help to bring up that this is somehow the 43rd longest page on the wiki, according to Special:LongPages. It's not even all that detailed. (It's the lists, I'm telling you). Allowing the stages to take off onto their own page would get this page down to the 300th or so place it should be at. Salmancer (talk) 07:02, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Can't you add the category on the redirect? Pipefan (talk) 09:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Is this section supposed to be justifying the proposed split? (Because if it is, I genuinely can't see it.) Nescientist (talk) 18:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
