Talk:Will-O-Wisp (move): Difference between revisions
ArcToraphim (talk | contribs) |
Force Fire (talk | contribs) |
||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Why was the part of "and the only non-Fire-type Pokemon to learn Will-o-wisp" in the trivia removed? That had to stay and it was true. {{unsigned|Makupe}} | Why was the part of "and the only non-Fire-type Pokemon to learn Will-o-wisp" in the trivia removed? That had to stay and it was true. {{unsigned|Makupe}} | ||
== Ghost Type == | |||
In my LeafGreen Will-O-Wisp is considered a Ghost-type move. I assume that this means that it was considered Ghost-type in Generation III. I was curious as to whether or not there was a reason that this was not in the Trivia section. If it should be, should I add it or will someone else. I ask because I am new. {{unsigned|WingZeroAlchemist}} | |||
:Will-O-Wisp has never been a Ghost-type move. Some people seem to think it is because it is commonly learned by Ghost-type Pokémon, but the moves summary screen shows it as a Fire-type move. <sc>[[User:Werdnae|<span style="color:#2D4B98;">Werdnae</span>]]</sc> <small>[[User talk:Werdnae|<span style="color:#009000;">(talk)</span>]]</small> 00:44, 9 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Translation == | |||
Just a nitpick on the translation of the move's Japanese name. I happen to know that ''onibi'' doesn't mean "Will-O-Wisp"; it actually translates to "devil fire". I have to wonder why "Will-O-Wisp" is there. '''[[User:SharKing|<font color="#330099">Shar</font><span style="background:#330099; color:#FFFF00;">K</span><font color="#FFFF00">ing</font>]] <sub>[[User talk:SharKing|<font color="#FF0000">Productions</font>]]</sub>''' 23:13, 9 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Magmar == | |||
Apparently Paul's Magmar/Magmortar used Will-o-Wisp, but it's not mentioned on this page. Could somebody fix that? | |||
Orcalapras 00:41, 22 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
:Magmar was never seen using the move. Since it wasn't seen, it can't be added. Also, don't forget to sign your posts by typing ing the four ~. [[User:Littlmiget123|Littlmiget123]] 00:54, 22 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
==Absol== | |||
I just had a Sableye with Prankster use Will-O-Wisp on an Absol with Justified... and it had no affect. Absol is not a Fire-type, and was not holding any items that can weaken or immunize Will-O-Wisp, so I do not know how this was possible. [[User:UxieLover1994|UxieLover1994]] ([[User talk:UxieLover1994|talk]]) 08:22, 25 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
:See [[Prankster (Ability)]]. In Generation VII, Dark-type Pokémon are immune to moves that have their priority boosted by Prankster. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 08:29, 25 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
==Tournament performance Trivia== | |||
Would the infamous number of misses of this move by Aaron "Cybertron" Zheng at Worlds one year be a reasonable thing to add? [[User:RomajiMiltonAmulo|romaji for short]] ([[User talk:RomajiMiltonAmulo|talk]]) 19:49, 18 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
:No.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#00A1E9">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#59C2F1">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#BF004F">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#D5598C">ire</span>]] 07:13, 19 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:13, 19 May 2021
Heatran
Heatran is listed as a pure fire type in the TM listing, I would change it, but I don't know how. --[[User:Improv]] 12:43, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Vulpix
Why was the part of "and the only non-Fire-type Pokemon to learn Will-o-wisp" in the trivia removed? That had to stay and it was true. - unsigned comment from Makupe (talk • contribs)
Ghost Type
In my LeafGreen Will-O-Wisp is considered a Ghost-type move. I assume that this means that it was considered Ghost-type in Generation III. I was curious as to whether or not there was a reason that this was not in the Trivia section. If it should be, should I add it or will someone else. I ask because I am new. - unsigned comment from WingZeroAlchemist (talk • contribs)
- Will-O-Wisp has never been a Ghost-type move. Some people seem to think it is because it is commonly learned by Ghost-type Pokémon, but the moves summary screen shows it as a Fire-type move. Werdnae (talk) 00:44, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
Translation
Just a nitpick on the translation of the move's Japanese name. I happen to know that onibi doesn't mean "Will-O-Wisp"; it actually translates to "devil fire". I have to wonder why "Will-O-Wisp" is there. SharKing Productions 23:13, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Magmar
Apparently Paul's Magmar/Magmortar used Will-o-Wisp, but it's not mentioned on this page. Could somebody fix that?
Orcalapras 00:41, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
- Magmar was never seen using the move. Since it wasn't seen, it can't be added. Also, don't forget to sign your posts by typing ing the four ~. Littlmiget123 00:54, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Absol
I just had a Sableye with Prankster use Will-O-Wisp on an Absol with Justified... and it had no affect. Absol is not a Fire-type, and was not holding any items that can weaken or immunize Will-O-Wisp, so I do not know how this was possible. UxieLover1994 (talk) 08:22, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
- See Prankster (Ability). In Generation VII, Dark-type Pokémon are immune to moves that have their priority boosted by Prankster. --SnorlaxMonster 08:29, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Tournament performance Trivia
Would the infamous number of misses of this move by Aaron "Cybertron" Zheng at Worlds one year be a reasonable thing to add? romaji for short (talk) 19:49, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
