Talk:Berry/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
<!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.--> | <!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.--> | ||
* I think that there are better articles than this one that could be an FAC article. - [[User:Pokemon1234567890|Pokémon1234567890]] 19:49, 7 February 2010 (UTC) | * I think that there are better articles than this one that could be an FAC article. - [[User:Pokemon1234567890|Pokémon1234567890]] 19:49, 7 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
**How does this mean the article isn't good enough for FAC? [[User:Turtwig A|Turt]][[wig]] [[Turtwig (Pokémon)|A]] ([[User talk:Turtwig A|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Turtwig A|contribs]]) 21:51, 7 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
====Other comments==== | ====Other comments==== | ||
Revision as of 21:51, 7 February 2010
Berry
Support (3)
- Support A very comprehensive article with information on every stage in the history of berries, from Gen II to Gen IV. Aesthetically pleasing, it is evident that a lot of time and effort went in to making the article what it is today. --RexRacer 18:34, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Very good and well written! Definitely worthy! Mudkipluvr4ever 18:56, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support! Rex hit the nail on the head, it's very in depth and covers berries in all canon by a reasonable amount. Maybe Munchlax's Berry Bonanza and Swalot Plop could be given a mention. I could try writing something up on each if nobody else wants to. Besides that I think it meets the standard. And I'm assuming we're not looking to have every berry that appears in the anime included in the article? --Emp, out 20:10, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Object (1)
- I think that there are better articles than this one that could be an FAC article. - Pokémon1234567890 19:49, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
