Talk:RocketShipping: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=AntiRocketShippers= | |||
Do AntiRocketShippers '''count'''? They aren't even RocketShippers! Why not add "AntiPokéShippers" to the types of PokéShippers? [[User:Ketsuban|Ketsuban]] | Do AntiRocketShippers '''count'''? They aren't even RocketShippers! Why not add "AntiPokéShippers" to the types of PokéShippers? [[User:Ketsuban|Ketsuban]] | ||
It's worth noting their major arguments against the pairing. [[User:Argy|Argy]] | It's worth noting their major arguments against the pairing. [[User:Argy|Argy]] | ||
Question on that -- Then why ''isn't'' there a section for "AntiPokéShippers" in the PokéShippers page?? Seems a little bias to me. I am thinking the Sects of RocketShipping needs to be rewritten. Instead of there being a section for "AntiRocketShippers" under the categories of RocketShipping (which makes no sense to me), there should just be a paragraph noting the major arguments against the pairing. --[[User:Mistress Puff|Puff]] 17:21, 12 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
=Hints= | |||
Does anyone know a page we can link to that lists hints for RocketShipping? I want to link to Pokemopolis' anti-RocketShipping page, but it would be unfair to have that as the only external link. [[User:Fabu-Vinny|FabuVinny]] 14:01, 25 October 2005 (CDT) | Does anyone know a page we can link to that lists hints for RocketShipping? I want to link to Pokemopolis' anti-RocketShipping page, but it would be unfair to have that as the only external link. [[User:Fabu-Vinny|FabuVinny]] 14:01, 25 October 2005 (CDT) | ||
Done and done. [[User:Musashi|Musashi]] | Done and done. [[User:Musashi|Musashi]] | ||
=R*cketshippers= | |||
Just curious, in reference to the last edit made on (15:15, 25 March 2007) by [[User:FrozenPandaMan|FrozenPandaMan]] - Why has the term "R*cketshippers" been changed to "Rocketshippers". :/ I'm not exactly active on creating shipping names, I just follow them - So before I make an edit I just want to know what the current shipping term should be for the 'old school shippers'. --[[User:Mistress Puff|Puff]] 16:22, 5 April 2007 (UTC) | Just curious, in reference to the last edit made on (15:15, 25 March 2007) by [[User:FrozenPandaMan|FrozenPandaMan]] - Why has the term "R*cketshippers" been changed to "Rocketshippers". :/ I'm not exactly active on creating shipping names, I just follow them - So before I make an edit I just want to know what the current shipping term should be for the 'old school shippers'. --[[User:Mistress Puff|Puff]] 16:22, 5 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:21, 12 July 2007
AntiRocketShippers
Do AntiRocketShippers count? They aren't even RocketShippers! Why not add "AntiPokéShippers" to the types of PokéShippers? Ketsuban
It's worth noting their major arguments against the pairing. Argy
Question on that -- Then why isn't there a section for "AntiPokéShippers" in the PokéShippers page?? Seems a little bias to me. I am thinking the Sects of RocketShipping needs to be rewritten. Instead of there being a section for "AntiRocketShippers" under the categories of RocketShipping (which makes no sense to me), there should just be a paragraph noting the major arguments against the pairing. --Puff 17:21, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Hints
Does anyone know a page we can link to that lists hints for RocketShipping? I want to link to Pokemopolis' anti-RocketShipping page, but it would be unfair to have that as the only external link. FabuVinny 14:01, 25 October 2005 (CDT)
Done and done. Musashi
R*cketshippers
Just curious, in reference to the last edit made on (15:15, 25 March 2007) by FrozenPandaMan - Why has the term "R*cketshippers" been changed to "Rocketshippers". :/ I'm not exactly active on creating shipping names, I just follow them - So before I make an edit I just want to know what the current shipping term should be for the 'old school shippers'. --Puff 16:22, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
