User talk:Adil/Archive 3: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
PsychicRider (talk | contribs) m (Protected "User talk:Adyniz": User Request ([edit=sysop] (expires 04:56, 3 May 2011 (UTC)) [move=sysop] (expires 04:56, 3 May 2011 (UTC)))) |
|
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 04:56, 2 May 2011
Re: Relative
The original poster posted saying something, then someone else posted saying that he was wrong, my post was agreeing with the original poster, how is agreeing with the original poster not relative? I mean I can see why you deleted everything after my first post because someone misunderstood my post and I had to clarify but how is my first post which is on topic and about what the conversation is, not relative? felinoel 12:37, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- If you didn't notice, that conversation ended 4 and a half months ago. As far as the original poster is concerned, Ataro cleared it up and replied already and the discussion ended there. Along with that, the reference that you gave, was not relative to the article but rather it was a personal comment or opinion regarding a noodle, how does that help improving an article? Talk pages are for discussing how to improve an article. Please have a look at our talk page policy and kindly give it a thorough reading. It says:
- 『Please check the dates of a discussion before you reply to it. Unless there a is good reason for revitalizing an old conversation, comments on sections older than six months old will be removed. This is because by this point the problems cited will have been cleared up.』
- The six months has been given here just in case if the case/dispute/issue has not been resolved till that time, which was clearly not the case here. So, please take care of it in the future, have a nice day. ♫♪エイディニズ♪♫ 15:11, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- Misinformation causing a discussion to end does not clear up the issue? The noodle in question was what the discussion was about, whether or not it pertains to the article well enough is not up to me to decide, the original poster obviously felt that the article would be improved with information about noodles otherwise they wouldn't have posted about it? felinoel 15:34, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- First, there is no need to edit the section title. Second, his point was not legitimate since the city's name is pronounced as "Rai-Mon / Rhy-mohn" instead. And Ramen is not pronounced as "Rahmon" and neither do people in the west pronounce ramen as "Ray-men" frequently and the so called "Misinformation" was cleared up by the end of the discussion back then. Even anime has revealed Raimon city's correct pronunciation by now, so there is not a single reason to reply to an old discussion which was not correct to begin with. ♫♪エイディニズ♪♫ 17:52, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- Whenever I make a discussion about something I always like to link to it in the title, I was feeling a bit lazy when I started this discussion and wanted to fix that? Anyways I never said it is pronounced mon and all I said was that everyone I know who knows nothing of anime pronounces it ray I never said the correct pronunciation was rahmon? felinoel 22:37, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- Did I ever accuse you for that? I was referring to the original poster who started the discussion as I clearly mentioned it above. Please read the discussions carefully otherwise it may create misunderstandings between the users, it will be beneficial for all of us. Thank you, have a nice day ahead. ♫♪エイディニズ♪♫ 01:28, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- I'm looking but I see no alleged clear referencing? Especially since you were directing your post towards me at the time. Before you say you weren't you were directing it towards the person who edited the title of the discussion which was me which is the only time you clearly referred to anyone. felinoel 03:17, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- The comments weren't helping improve the article, they were removed. Standard talk page policy. Can this discussion please be dropped now? Thanks. —♥ Jellotalk 03:25, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- k, so do I just delete comments of the same or less quality or do I post a link to it on a mod's page for them to delete? felinoel 04:23, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- Inform a staff member, we'll take care of it. ♫♪エイディニズ♪♫ 04:27, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- From your userboxes I assume you are 'staff' so here fix this. felinoel 04:48, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- This too, wow all I did was go to the Random Page link until I found a page with anything in the talk and then checked out the talk page, the so far two out of two of these both had stuff that wouldn't help the article... how come no one is getting rid of these? One even have been on that article page for four years before someone noticed? felinoel 04:53, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- From your userboxes I assume you are 'staff' so here fix this. felinoel 04:48, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- Inform a staff member, we'll take care of it. ♫♪エイディニズ♪♫ 04:27, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- k, so do I just delete comments of the same or less quality or do I post a link to it on a mod's page for them to delete? felinoel 04:23, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- The comments weren't helping improve the article, they were removed. Standard talk page policy. Can this discussion please be dropped now? Thanks. —♥ Jellotalk 03:25, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- I'm looking but I see no alleged clear referencing? Especially since you were directing your post towards me at the time. Before you say you weren't you were directing it towards the person who edited the title of the discussion which was me which is the only time you clearly referred to anyone. felinoel 03:17, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- Did I ever accuse you for that? I was referring to the original poster who started the discussion as I clearly mentioned it above. Please read the discussions carefully otherwise it may create misunderstandings between the users, it will be beneficial for all of us. Thank you, have a nice day ahead. ♫♪エイディニズ♪♫ 01:28, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- Whenever I make a discussion about something I always like to link to it in the title, I was feeling a bit lazy when I started this discussion and wanted to fix that? Anyways I never said it is pronounced mon and all I said was that everyone I know who knows nothing of anime pronounces it ray I never said the correct pronunciation was rahmon? felinoel 22:37, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- First, there is no need to edit the section title. Second, his point was not legitimate since the city's name is pronounced as "Rai-Mon / Rhy-mohn" instead. And Ramen is not pronounced as "Rahmon" and neither do people in the west pronounce ramen as "Ray-men" frequently and the so called "Misinformation" was cleared up by the end of the discussion back then. Even anime has revealed Raimon city's correct pronunciation by now, so there is not a single reason to reply to an old discussion which was not correct to begin with. ♫♪エイディニズ♪♫ 17:52, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- Misinformation causing a discussion to end does not clear up the issue? The noodle in question was what the discussion was about, whether or not it pertains to the article well enough is not up to me to decide, the original poster obviously felt that the article would be improved with information about noodles otherwise they wouldn't have posted about it? felinoel 15:34, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- The six months has been given here just in case if the case/dispute/issue has not been resolved till that time, which was clearly not the case here. So, please take care of it in the future, have a nice day. ♫♪エイディニズ♪♫ 15:11, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- 『Please check the dates of a discussion before you reply to it. Unless there a is good reason for revitalizing an old conversation, comments on sections older than six months old will be removed. This is because by this point the problems cited will have been cleared up.』
