Talk:Sucker Punch (move): Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
(→Term should be included: new section) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:It means that it only works if the opponent is using a damage-dealing move. '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000;">T</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000;">T</span>]][[wp:Echidna|<span style="color:#FF0000;">E</span><span style="color:#0000FF;">chidna</span>]]''' 21:21, 9 July 2007 (UTC) | :It means that it only works if the opponent is using a damage-dealing move. '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000;">T</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000;">T</span>]][[wp:Echidna|<span style="color:#FF0000;">E</span><span style="color:#0000FF;">chidna</span>]]''' 21:21, 9 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
Ah, Thanks For That. - [[User:Tesh|Tesh]] - | Ah, Thanks For That. - [[User:Tesh|Tesh]] - | ||
== Term should be included == | |||
"Despite being called "Sucker Punch", it isn't really a punching attack, as many Pokémon that learn this attack do not even possess arms that can deliver a punch." | |||
This sentence is useless on it's own as it does not explain why the move is called "Sucker Punch" despite Pokémon without arms learning it. Maybe the term for a sucker punch should be included with a reference to the direct Japanese translation as proof? | |||
Revision as of 14:55, 26 June 2008
What does it mean "Readying an attack" - Tesh - 21:59pm 9th July 2007
- It means that it only works if the opponent is using a damage-dealing move. TTEchidna 21:21, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Ah, Thanks For That. - Tesh -
Term should be included
"Despite being called "Sucker Punch", it isn't really a punching attack, as many Pokémon that learn this attack do not even possess arms that can deliver a punch."
This sentence is useless on it's own as it does not explain why the move is called "Sucker Punch" despite Pokémon without arms learning it. Maybe the term for a sucker punch should be included with a reference to the direct Japanese translation as proof?
