Talk:Future Sight (move): Difference between revisions
Vuvuzela2010 (talk | contribs) |
Emeraldben (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
:I added it. '''[[User:LimeGreenCharizard|<span style="color:#008000;">LimeGreen</span>]]''[[User talk:LimeGreenCharizard|<span style="color:#FF8C00;">Charizard</span>]]'''''[[Special:Contributions/LimeGreenCharizard|<span style="color:#00BFFF;">♂</span>]] 13:03, 4 November 2011 (UTC) | :I added it. '''[[User:LimeGreenCharizard|<span style="color:#008000;">LimeGreen</span>]]''[[User talk:LimeGreenCharizard|<span style="color:#FF8C00;">Charizard</span>]]'''''[[Special:Contributions/LimeGreenCharizard|<span style="color:#00BFFF;">♂</span>]] 13:03, 4 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
::Apparently its not actually Future Sight, so both pages have been changed accordingly. [[User:Vuvuzela2010|<span style="color:#FFFFFF; background-color:#6890F0">'''Vuvuzela2010''']]</span>[[Latios (Pokémon)|<span style="color:red; background-color:#6890F0"> Δ ]]</span> 13:18, 4 November 2011 (UTC) | ::Apparently its not actually Future Sight, so both pages have been changed accordingly. [[User:Vuvuzela2010|<span style="color:#FFFFFF; background-color:#6890F0">'''Vuvuzela2010''']]</span>[[Latios (Pokémon)|<span style="color:red; background-color:#6890F0"> Δ ]]</span> 13:18, 4 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
*She does actually say use future sight though dont she?[[User:Emeraldben|Emeraldben]] 21:19, 4 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:19, 4 November 2011
Tyranitar
Why did it affect my Tyranitar if it was Psychic Type?
File:Ani475MS.gif Agent 448Talk | DP 
02:51, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure it doesn't take type into account. I remember using it on a Fighting-type to no super-effectiveness.--Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 03:20, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, it and Doom Desire are calculated differently. TTEchidna 05:30, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
- The in-game data may have a Power, but I think that is calculated differently as well. When I was capturing Azelf, I used a level 23 Kricketune. Each time I tried, Azelf used this attack and each time it hit Kricketune it took off different amounts each time. Sometimes Kricketune would faint, sometimes it would only take off a little. TESHIGIGAS 17:54, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
- Did it use Nasty Plot? --PLA 12:36, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
- The in-game data may have a Power, but I think that is calculated differently as well. When I was capturing Azelf, I used a level 23 Kricketune. Each time I tried, Azelf used this attack and each time it hit Kricketune it took off different amounts each time. Sometimes Kricketune would faint, sometimes it would only take off a little. TESHIGIGAS 17:54, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, it and Doom Desire are calculated differently. TTEchidna 05:30, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
STAB
So, Future Sight do not take type into account. What about STAB? Tenno Seremel 09:30, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- Nope. Because it is technically typeless, it does not get STAB, hits all Pokémon and bypasses Wonder Guard. — THE TROM — 09:40, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thought so. I didn't know about Wonder Guard though. I'll need to check this. Thanks. Tenno Seremel 11:56, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Focus Sash
Focus Sash in the “In-battle effect item” description says otherwise:
Can also protect against multiple-strike moves such as Fury Attack and Triple Kick, recoil damage, and self-inflicted confusion damage, but not Future Sight and Doom Desire.
Which one is correct?
— Tenno Seremel 07:19, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Twistedspoon
Because it is technically typeless, does it take items like Twistedspoon into account? It shouldn't... FrozenStrategy 23:08, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
Psychic type.
As it's no longer typeless, can it still hit through Wonder Guard? I suppose it will also be resisted by Psychic, Steel and Dark now. PLA 12:54, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Kirlia?
Can someone add http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Melodi Melodi's Kirlia to the anime list please?Emeraldben 12:17, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
- I added it. LimeGreenCharizard♂ 13:03, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
- Apparently its not actually Future Sight, so both pages have been changed accordingly. Vuvuzela2010 Δ 13:18, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
- She does actually say use future sight though dont she?Emeraldben 21:19, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
