User talk:TTEchidna/Archive Oct 07: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New section: Glitches)
Line 10: Line 10:
::It would be better if it had even bad-translated sense, don't you think? ;) Contact with me. AIM Jerzy232, MSN etamitlu@gazeta.pl. I will translate what you wanted to write. - [[User:Etamitlu|Etamitlu]] 19:28, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
::It would be better if it had even bad-translated sense, don't you think? ;) Contact with me. AIM Jerzy232, MSN etamitlu@gazeta.pl. I will translate what you wanted to write. - [[User:Etamitlu|Etamitlu]] 19:28, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
:::True. I'll do so ASAP. '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000">TTE</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#0000FF">chidna</span>]]''' 21:00, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
:::True. I'll do so ASAP. '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000">TTE</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#0000FF">chidna</span>]]''' 21:00, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
== Glitches ==
As you may already know, I have been having a SOMEWHAT heated discussion with several other members over the notability of glitches and whether or not they should be such a significant part of Bulbapedia.  At first, I found that many glitch articles required cleanup, but then I decided that they were just too useless and irrelevant to bother with.  So I marked several for deletion.  Yes, I know it was a mistake and you don't need to give me all the reasons why.  However, I still believe that articles like [[Glitchy Charizard]] and [[Invisible Shiny Bulbasaur]] do not deserve their own pages.  Fabu-Vinny told me to appeal to a member of the editorial board, and here I am.  My suggestion is to move any glitch Pokémon based off a real Pokémon into that Pokémon's trivia section.  [[Invisible Shiny Bulbasaur]] goes under [[Bulbasaur]]'s trivia.  Then, whatever is left over, like [[MissingNo.]], can be merged into one fairly big article, [[List of Glitch Pokémon]].  On that list, we can have a short description of each.  See what you think. 
Important enough to put on your talk page?        -[[Image:Spr 3e 186.gif|30px]][[User:Politoed666|<span style="color:#30D5C8">Politoed</span>]][[User talk:Politoed666|<span style="color:#FF69B4">666</span>]][[Image:Spr 3e 186.gif|30px]]

Revision as of 21:10, 2 October 2007

157
 
Aug 2006-Aug 2007Sept 2007Oct 2007Nov-Dec 2007Jan-Feb 2008
Mar-Apr 2008May-June 2008July-Aug 2008Sept 2008 (123)
Oct 2008 (12) • Election specialNovember, 2008Dec 2008 (12)
Jan 2009 (12) • Feb 2009Mar-Apr 2009May 2009Jun-Jul 2009
Aug-Sep 2009Oct 2009Nov-Dec 2009Jan-Mar 2010Apr-May 2010
Jun-Aug 2010Sep-Dec 2010

If you need to leave me a message, please do so by clicking the + tab next to "edit this page". Only do this IF it's really, really important. I wanna try to keep this from needing to be archived every twenty seconds. TTEchidna

Polish desc

"Czas podróżować kolczatka australijska (Time Traveling Echidna) od Bulbapedia."
Means: "Time to travel australian echidna (Time Traveling Echidna) from Bulbapedia."
What the f___ is that supposed to mean? You were using electronic translators, weren't you? Bad idea - Polish is a language that you cannot use with translators and do this correct. That sign is a complete nonsense. - Etamitlu 12:34, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

You bet. But I feel like I gotta put something, even if it's badly-translated. TTEchidna 19:08, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
It would be better if it had even bad-translated sense, don't you think? ;) Contact with me. AIM Jerzy232, MSN etamitlu@gazeta.pl. I will translate what you wanted to write. - Etamitlu 19:28, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
True. I'll do so ASAP. TTEchidna 21:00, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Glitches

As you may already know, I have been having a SOMEWHAT heated discussion with several other members over the notability of glitches and whether or not they should be such a significant part of Bulbapedia. At first, I found that many glitch articles required cleanup, but then I decided that they were just too useless and irrelevant to bother with. So I marked several for deletion. Yes, I know it was a mistake and you don't need to give me all the reasons why. However, I still believe that articles like Glitchy Charizard and Invisible Shiny Bulbasaur do not deserve their own pages. Fabu-Vinny told me to appeal to a member of the editorial board, and here I am. My suggestion is to move any glitch Pokémon based off a real Pokémon into that Pokémon's trivia section. Invisible Shiny Bulbasaur goes under Bulbasaur's trivia. Then, whatever is left over, like MissingNo., can be merged into one fairly big article, List of Glitch Pokémon. On that list, we can have a short description of each. See what you think.

Important enough to put on your talk page? -File:Spr 3e 186.gifPolitoed666File:Spr 3e 186.gif