Talk:Legendary giants: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I've heard them referred to as the Llegendary Trashcans and the Regis. [[User:Surskitty|surskitty]] 10:35, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC) | I've heard them referred to as the Llegendary Trashcans and the Regis. [[User:Surskitty|surskitty]] 10:35, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC) | ||
For the sake of argument, I'll mention now that ''rex'' and ''regis'' are '''both''' singular in Latin. (However, ''rex'' is nominative, ''regis'' is genitive.) The nominative plural is ''reges''. (If you've ever wondered why the plural and possessive as so similar in English, well, same thing applies here. Blame the Proto-Indo-Europeans.) - [[User:Zhen Lin|振霖]]<sub>[[User talk:Zhen Lin|T]]</sub> 13:32, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:32, 21 April 2005
Are they really called that? I've only heard them referred to as "The regis"-Birdboy2000
They are golems, that's correct. evkl 03:10, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I dunno, I call them Gits. Each one of thier nicknames on my Sapphire has a profanity because of how stressed I got trying to capture them. - Ferret
The beings they were designed to resemble were the mythical Golems, which have little relation to Golem. evkl 10:33, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I've heard them referred to as the Llegendary Trashcans and the Regis. surskitty 10:35, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
For the sake of argument, I'll mention now that rex and regis are both singular in Latin. (However, rex is nominative, regis is genitive.) The nominative plural is reges. (If you've ever wondered why the plural and possessive as so similar in English, well, same thing applies here. Blame the Proto-Indo-Europeans.) - 振霖T 13:32, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
