Talk:Damage: Difference between revisions
MilesPikachu (talk | contribs) (→Zero damage?: new section) |
|||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
:::I would imagine the damage part refers to the [[Double Battle#Effects on moves|damage penalty]] that moves like Surf incur. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 18:32, 7 December 2014 (UTC) | :::I would imagine the damage part refers to the [[Double Battle#Effects on moves|damage penalty]] that moves like Surf incur. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 18:32, 7 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
::::Derp, I missed that when I was reviewing damage, thank you([[User:Arcalargo|Arcalargo]] ([[User talk:Arcalargo|talk]]) 18:34, 7 December 2014 (UTC)) | ::::Derp, I missed that when I was reviewing damage, thank you([[User:Arcalargo|Arcalargo]] ([[User talk:Arcalargo|talk]]) 18:34, 7 December 2014 (UTC)) | ||
== Zero damage? == | |||
Umm, well I was reading a bit about the damage formula and at some point the zero damage got my curiosity, since it was done in a Black/White version I wanted to try it on a X/Y version. | |||
I tried this with a Lv 100 Steelix with 469 Defense, aditionally it has Reflect and x6 boost on Defense, againts a Zigzagoon Lv 2. | |||
I didn't made the formula, knowing the advantage of type (Which make 0,50), Reflect and the Defense boost it SHOULD hit zero. | |||
In the video I've seen a Lv 100 Celebi which can have a max of 328 plus a reflect and nothing more, so the max Defense it can have is of 492 (Adding the 50% of the Reflect), got hitted by Tackle from a Lv 4 Lillipup, I expect the Lillipup Attack would be around 5~9 | |||
Knowing that the set I used was obviously better I made the formula for this one, I don't know if I've done the formula correctly (If someone can help me, I'd be pleased), so here it go: | |||
( 2 * 4 + 10 ) / 250 = 0,072, that's the first value. | |||
5~9 / 492 = 0,010162602~0,018292683, that's the second value (Note it's 492 and not 328 because I'm adding the effect of Reflect, which is a 50% plus to 328). | |||
All together it should be something like: | |||
0,072 * 0,010162602~0,018292683 * 50 + 2 = 2,036585367~2,065853659 | |||
Then adding the multiplier of Modifier: | |||
1,5 * 1 * 1 * 1 * 0,85~1 = 1,275~1,5 | |||
With the first result: | |||
2,036585367~2,065853659 * 1,275~1,5 = 2,596646343~3,098780488 | |||
Celebi should receive at least 2 or 3 of damage if it rounded down. | |||
So here's my questions: | |||
1. Did I do something wrong in the formula? | |||
2. Maybe it is only possible on Gen V and prior to it? | |||
3. If the last Question is no, why my Steelix keep getting 1 damage? | |||
Yeah, I was really bored to do all this instead of my math HW >.> | |||
[[User:MilesPikachu|MilesPikachu]] ([[User talk:MilesPikachu|talk]]) 18:47, 6 January 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:47, 6 January 2015
Does the Damage formula below account for critical hits? I don't see any area in it which does, would it be worth noting it?
Nothinhappened 22:03, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
- It's noted in the damage modification section. A CH does 2x damage, after the formula has been applied. —darklordtrom 01:40, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
held Item?
It isn't that clear the part that says that some held Items and Berries increase the damage inflicted in other Pokémon! I did understand the formula at the bottom of the page, but there isn't any clear explanation about it. Would someone, please? Exactly where/when would the "extra 20%" bonus of NeverMeltIce apply? YukitoOoO 22:09, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
Move the formula to Modification?
It seems like a good thing to do, because a lot of the stuff here is repeated anyway, and most of what affects the formulas is in the Modification section anyway. Ztobor 03:55, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Mild contridiction in a very specific criteria
--Noltron200 17:28, 6 August 2010 (UTC)Noltron200
In this page, it says this "Critical is 2 for a critical hit, 1 otherwise. For Pokémon with Sniper, it is 3 for a critical hit. " in the series of bullet notes.
In the description of Sniper, in the Sniper(ability) page, it says this "Sniper multiplies the base power of an attack 1.5× during a critical hit. "
Becuase the damage equation goes " ...×base + 2)×Modifier ", the first source would multiply the +2 by two, meanwhile the second source would not, becuase it multiplies the move's base attack, and than is added by two.
Merely 2 points difference, but its something to consider.
Double/Triple Battle?
In the other section of the formula, it states "other counts for things like held items, Abilities, field advantages, and whether the battle is a Double Battle or Triple Battle or not." What effect does being a double or triple battle have on damage? I understand targeting differences, but not damage. Can someone help me with this? (Arcalargo (talk) 15:30, 7 December 2014 (UTC))
- Some moves, such as Flame Burst, which affect non-targeted Pokémon with indirect damage. There are also abilities such as Friend Guard that affect damage taken by allies. While it's not the double or triple battle itself that has any effect on damage, there are factors that only apply outside of single battles. --GuyPerfect (talk) 15:39, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- So to confirm, there isn't really anything about the double or triple battle itself. Its just abilities(which are already listed) that effect damage, correct? - unsigned comment from Arcalargo (talk • contribs)
- I would imagine the damage part refers to the damage penalty that moves like Surf incur. Tiddlywinks (talk) 18:32, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- So to confirm, there isn't really anything about the double or triple battle itself. Its just abilities(which are already listed) that effect damage, correct? - unsigned comment from Arcalargo (talk • contribs)
Zero damage?
Umm, well I was reading a bit about the damage formula and at some point the zero damage got my curiosity, since it was done in a Black/White version I wanted to try it on a X/Y version.
I tried this with a Lv 100 Steelix with 469 Defense, aditionally it has Reflect and x6 boost on Defense, againts a Zigzagoon Lv 2.
I didn't made the formula, knowing the advantage of type (Which make 0,50), Reflect and the Defense boost it SHOULD hit zero.
In the video I've seen a Lv 100 Celebi which can have a max of 328 plus a reflect and nothing more, so the max Defense it can have is of 492 (Adding the 50% of the Reflect), got hitted by Tackle from a Lv 4 Lillipup, I expect the Lillipup Attack would be around 5~9
Knowing that the set I used was obviously better I made the formula for this one, I don't know if I've done the formula correctly (If someone can help me, I'd be pleased), so here it go:
( 2 * 4 + 10 ) / 250 = 0,072, that's the first value.
5~9 / 492 = 0,010162602~0,018292683, that's the second value (Note it's 492 and not 328 because I'm adding the effect of Reflect, which is a 50% plus to 328).
All together it should be something like:
0,072 * 0,010162602~0,018292683 * 50 + 2 = 2,036585367~2,065853659
Then adding the multiplier of Modifier:
1,5 * 1 * 1 * 1 * 0,85~1 = 1,275~1,5
With the first result:
2,036585367~2,065853659 * 1,275~1,5 = 2,596646343~3,098780488
Celebi should receive at least 2 or 3 of damage if it rounded down.
So here's my questions:
1. Did I do something wrong in the formula?
2. Maybe it is only possible on Gen V and prior to it?
3. If the last Question is no, why my Steelix keep getting 1 damage?
Yeah, I was really bored to do all this instead of my math HW >.>
MilesPikachu (talk) 18:47, 6 January 2015 (UTC)