Talk:Poké Pelago

Name Origin

Most of this is obvious but I figure we should add it anyway-

Poké Pelago comes from archipelago

Isle Abeens, when said aloud, is identical to "Isle o' Beans" which is what it is, Isle Aphun is the same case as Abeens but it is "Isle o' Fun", and Isle Evelup is also the same but "I'll Level Up" or "Isle Level Up"

--Celadonkey (talk) 15:46, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Isle Aplenny is "Isle o' Plenty" and Isle Avue is "I Love You", as well. - unsigned comment from disallowances (talk • contribs)

Hot Spring Isle function revealed

In this official video from Nintendo where Junichi Masuda and Shigeru Ohmori talked about their Top 5 favorite things from Alola, Junichi Masuda revealed that the final unknown island (the hot spring island) can be used to hatch Pokemon eggs. - unsigned comment from Aozora210 (talk • contribs)

Items in Isle Aphun

Items/rewards available from each mission:

Odd-Shard Hunting Blue Shard, Green Shard, Red Shard, Yellow Shard, Hard Stone, Revive, Star Piece

Brilliant Stone Hunting Dawn Stone, Dusk Stone, Fire Stone, Float Stone, Hard Stone, Ice Stone, Leaf Stone, Moon Stone, Oval Stone, Shiny Stone, Sun Stone, Thunder Stone, Water Stone

Rare-Treasure Hunting Big Pearl, Pearl, Pearl String, Hard Stone, Rare Bone, Big Nugget, Gold Bottle Cap, Comet Shard

Interesting-Item Hunting Blue Shard, Green Shard, Red Shard, Yellow Shard, Revive, Star Piece, Dawn Stone, Dusk Stone, Fire Stone, Float Stone, Hard Stone, Ice Stone, Leaf Stone, Moon Stone, Oval Stone, Shiny Stone, Sun Stone, Thunder Stone, Water Stone, Big Pearl, Pearl, Pearl String, Rare Bone, Big Nugget, Gold Bottle Cap, Comet Shard

Assuming equal priority

Wowy: Re this. How is "assuming equal priority" confusing? It is not more efficient if one already has all the Pokemon they use in battle maxed out on affection and Pokebeans are used primarily for developing islands. Your wording is misleading and requires nuance. If you don't like the way I nuanced it, how would you prefer it be worded? Satorukun0530 (talk) 00:38, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

I kind of think that addition was confusing also, but it was also confusing beforehand. It's been edited now. Tiddlywinks (talk) 00:57, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, the current wording solves my initial concern, but now it might have gone too far in the other direction. As far as I know, the Poke Pelago is the main way to get beans, so if Refresh is a priority then it isn't more efficient to trade in rainbow beans, since for Refresh the more rainbow beans the better. It may be that the indentation means that the whole point is meant to be read in light of Having Poké Beans inside the box on an island..., but that isn't really clear. Satorukun0530 (talk) 01:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

The point makes no reference to Refresh. The point only talks about Poke Pelago. It doesn't need to talk about Refresh. People can decide on their own if they want to use Beans there instead. There is no objective comparison to make between them otherwise. Tiddlywinks (talk) 01:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

I was just about to say the same thing (but got an edit conflict instead :)) --Wowy_(토크) 02:01, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Meh. I guess if it doesn't explicitly claim that it's more efficient to use them for one or the other of developing islands or Refresh (which is how I read it at first) the there's no serious problem. I might have been biased in favour of mentioning that we are assuming Refresh is not a higher priority because the article as I first read it did make this assumption without explicitly stating so. Satorukun0530 (talk) 03:15, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Experience in Isle Evelup

I just put pokemon through one play session on Isle Evelup at its second stage; the gain was 150 experience. I was going to edit the table to reflect that, but I'm not familiar with the format of the edit page and I'm not sure which line is which box in the table. Can someone either let me know, or make the edit themselves? Deepforest01 (talk) 19:31, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Added. glik^glak 21:44, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Exact encounter rates

Can we use ScireM's calculations? Nescientist (talk) 16:25, 9 June 2017 (UTC)