Talk:Pokémon Ultra Sun and Ultra Moon: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
:The logo colors look identical to me. [[User:Nyargleblargle|Nyargleblargle]] ([[User talk:Nyargleblargle|talk]]) 16:05, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
:The logo colors look identical to me. [[User:Nyargleblargle|Nyargleblargle]] ([[User talk:Nyargleblargle|talk]]) 16:05, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
::How do I make color templates for them? It won't let me.--[[User:Hamfart|<span style="color:#F16A81">Hamfart</span>]]
::How do I make color templates for them? It won't let me.--[[User:Hamfart|<span style="color:#F16A81">Hamfart</span>]]
:::You don't. The admins will at some point. ☆<span style="font-family:Algerian">[[User:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:green">The</span>]] [[User talk:Solar Dragon|<span style="color:red">Solar</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Solar Dragon|<span style="color:blue">Dragon</span>]]</span>☆ 20:56, 7 June 2017 (UTC)


== New Pokémon ==
== New Pokémon ==

Revision as of 20:56, 7 June 2017

Logos

I'm not autoconfirmed yet, so I can't upload them myself, but individual logos are available on Nintendo's website. We might want to use them as the infobox images to avoid redlinks. Nyargleblargle (talk) 15:11, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Infobox Colors

I think the Ultra Sun and Ultra Moon colors should be different from the Sun and Moon colors, as Ultra Sun is more red-orangish and Ultra Moon is more of a purple, at least in official media Superjustinbros. (talk) 16:03, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

These colors are just temporary. --Carmen (Talk | contribs) 16:04, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
The logo colors look identical to me. Nyargleblargle (talk) 16:05, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
How do I make color templates for them? It won't let me.--Hamfart
You don't. The admins will at some point. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 20:56, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

New Pokémon

Nintendo of Italy confirmed me that there won't be "new Pokémon", but "alternative Pokémon forms not seen before". In the communicate they received from TPCi this is written and that the text in the Direct were mistakenly translitterated. I believe the phrase in the text should be corrected..--Franky7 (talk) 19:13, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

The only claim in the article about which Pokémon will appear is "The games will feature Pokémon that did not appear in Pokémon Sun and Moon", which is taken directly from what the Direct said. While it's clear that new forms are being introduced (from the Solgaleo/Necrozma and Lunala/Necrozma fusions), there hasn't been any mention of "new Pokémon" from what I've seen. What phrase should be corrected?
Haddady ~Straight Outta the Bag~ 19:31, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
I think it's clear that whoever wrote for the Direct intentionally made the "did not appear in Sun and Moon" clause as vague as possible, so that it can cover the possibilities of new Pokemon, new forms, or even just old Pokemon that weren't in the Alola Dex. Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 19:36, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Yes, I referred to that phrase. I didn't mean that it says clearly there will be new Pokémon, I only suggested to changed it to specify that there will be new forms (this way, maybe: ""The games will feature new Pokémon forms that did not appear in Pokémon Sun and Moon""). And, yes Pumpkinking, maybe it was, but it sounds strangely that Nintendo itself received another note different from the one in the video, but everything can be.--Franky7 (talk) 19:58, 6 June 2017 (UTC)