User talk:Little kingsfan2005: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Force Fire (talk | contribs) (→Roark's Onix: new section) |
|||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
Roark's Onix is not notable for its own article, per the [[Bulbapedia:Manual of style/Anime#Notability requirements|notability requirements]]. All it did was battle, that alone is not enough for it to have its own article. Thank you.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#EBC600">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#EBC600">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#D8B600">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#D8B600">ire</span>]] 17:37, 29 September 2019 (UTC) | Roark's Onix is not notable for its own article, per the [[Bulbapedia:Manual of style/Anime#Notability requirements|notability requirements]]. All it did was battle, that alone is not enough for it to have its own article. Thank you.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#EBC600">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#EBC600">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#D8B600">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#D8B600">ire</span>]] 17:37, 29 September 2019 (UTC) | ||
:On that note, I highly recommend that you, as a new user, review the notability requirements in the link provided by Force Fire. This site has a very particular way of determining what is notable and what is not, and you're going to have to be on top of those rules if you wish to be a longtime contributor. [[User:GrammarFreak01|GrammarFreak01]] ([[User talk:GrammarFreak01|talk]]) 19:52, 29 September 2019 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 19:52, 29 September 2019
Welcome to Bulbapedia, Little kingsfan2005! | |
By creating your account you are now able to edit pages, join discussions, and expand the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia. Before you jump in, here are some ground rules:
| |
Thank you, and have a good time editing here! GrammarFreak01 (talk) 03:17, 28 September 2019 (UTC) |
Roark's Onix
Roark's Onix is not notable for its own article, per the notability requirements. All it did was battle, that alone is not enough for it to have its own article. Thank you.--ForceFire 17:37, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
- On that note, I highly recommend that you, as a new user, review the notability requirements in the link provided by Force Fire. This site has a very particular way of determining what is notable and what is not, and you're going to have to be on top of those rules if you wish to be a longtime contributor. GrammarFreak01 (talk) 19:52, 29 September 2019 (UTC)