User talk:48Pills: Difference between revisions
Force Fire (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m (SnorlaxMonster moved page User talk:48Pills/Archive 2 to User talk:48Pills without leaving a redirect: History merge) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== TCG text formatting == | == TCG text formatting == | ||
Line 39: | Line 9: | ||
:Please don't make this sound like laws have been broken, they are simply the rules that you're choosing to impose today, rules that mean absolutely nothing, and if all this visual clutter is so offensive, feel free to change it. [[User:48Pills|48Pills]] ([[User talk:48Pills|talk]]) 19:03, 14 April 2020 (UTC) | :Please don't make this sound like laws have been broken, they are simply the rules that you're choosing to impose today, rules that mean absolutely nothing, and if all this visual clutter is so offensive, feel free to change it. [[User:48Pills|48Pills]] ([[User talk:48Pills|talk]]) 19:03, 14 April 2020 (UTC) | ||
::This is the explanation [https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Call_of_Legends_(TCG)&type=revision&diff=3146163&oldid=3145923 you requested] for me reverting your edits. So that when I do remove the unnecessary formatting, you don't add it back and don't continue making the mistake of using too much of it. If you don't agree with these standards, you're free to argue to change them, but you ''do'' need to follow them. <small>[[User:Glik|glik]]</small><sup>[[User talk:Glik|glak]]</sup> 21:32, 14 April 2020 (UTC) | ::This is the explanation [https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Call_of_Legends_(TCG)&type=revision&diff=3146163&oldid=3145923 you requested] for me reverting your edits. So that when I do remove the unnecessary formatting, you don't add it back and don't continue making the mistake of using too much of it. If you don't agree with these standards, you're free to argue to change them, but you ''do'' need to follow them. <small>[[User:Glik|glik]]</small><sup>[[User talk:Glik|glak]]</sup> 21:32, 14 April 2020 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:08, 15 April 2020
TCG text formatting
Bold is something done for the subject of an article, it's not something done specifically for TCG things. Expansion articles have two subjects, both the international and equivalent Japanese set, so they both get bolded the first time the names pop up.
While international expansions are officially italicized, we don't bother with it outside the lead-in as it causes a lot of visual clutter and looks weird when combined with Japanese sets which aren't italicized. Same goes for TCG Series (which is capitalized). Decks, card names, and evolution stages aren't italicized. Some card classifications like LV.X have italicization, some don't, but the "Pokémon" part of it never is.
And the EX Series doesn't have any — in the titles, the EX is a regular part of the name. glikglak 17:20, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- Please don't make this sound like laws have been broken, they are simply the rules that you're choosing to impose today, rules that mean absolutely nothing, and if all this visual clutter is so offensive, feel free to change it. 48Pills (talk) 19:03, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- This is the explanation you requested for me reverting your edits. So that when I do remove the unnecessary formatting, you don't add it back and don't continue making the mistake of using too much of it. If you don't agree with these standards, you're free to argue to change them, but you do need to follow them. glikglak 21:32, 14 April 2020 (UTC)