Talk:Pika: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
:Or as themselves? We've already got the Pika article, so if an article on Yellow's Pikachu, [[Chuchu]], would be considered notable, it could be written at anytime. --[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 17:51, 15 March 2008 (UTC) | :Or as themselves? We've already got the Pika article, so if an article on Yellow's Pikachu, [[Chuchu]], would be considered notable, it could be written at anytime. --[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 17:51, 15 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
Dude, I could do that. It's easy. [[User:DaPikanator56|DaPikanator56]] 12:10, 16 March 2008 (UTC) | Dude, I could do that. It's easy. [[User:DaPikanator56|DaPikanator56]] 12:10, 16 March 2008 (UTC) {{u|DaPikanator56}} | ||
Revision as of 20:36, 29 March 2008
I don't know ANYTHING about Pokémon Special and Manga, so I'm asking: Is this article real???? --File:Spr 3e 059.gifFile:Spr 3e 132.gifTheryguy512 File:Trozeiani025.gif 01:09, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Of course it's real, what does that question mean anyway?! Conanfan1412 19:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, but sometimes people make fake Pokémon pages, or they forget to put user pages in user namespace. --File:Spr 3e 059.gifFile:Spr 3e 132.gifTheryguy512 File:Trozeiani025.gif 01:57, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Hey, in that table, souldn't be "chapter" instead of "episode"? -File:Ani038MS.gifうずまき ハルカ
03:27, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- It's a template. It's the Animeinfobox, I think... so it shows up as episode. We don't really have many articles on manga Pokémon though, so.. yeah. User:TinaTheKirlia/Sig 03:30, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Pika+ChuChu
I seriously would like to consider us putting comments up about pika and chuchu. DaPikanator56
- As a couple? If that's what you mean, that's best done on Shipping:PikaChuChuShipping, despite the fact that they're technically a canon couple.
- Or as themselves? We've already got the Pika article, so if an article on Yellow's Pikachu, Chuchu, would be considered notable, it could be written at anytime. --Shiningpikablu252 17:51, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Dude, I could do that. It's easy. DaPikanator56 12:10, 16 March 2008 (UTC) DaPikanator56
