Talk:Excavate (move): Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


::Wouldn't this fit better under Glitches or Secrets? I'm not too sure that dummied-out TMs or moves that are only useable with a hack should fall under MoveDex. <span style="color:green">[[User:Vekter|Vekter]]</span> 17:13, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
::Wouldn't this fit better under Glitches or Secrets? I'm not too sure that dummied-out TMs or moves that are only useable with a hack should fall under MoveDex. <span style="color:green">[[User:Vekter|Vekter]]</span> 17:13, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
:::Well, {{m|Struggle}} is given its contest data, so eh. If it's dummied out but still a valid move... I say keep it with movedex. Unlike the move TM55, it's a real move. '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000">''TTE''</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|chidna]]''' 22:40, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:40, 22 April 2008

This move and moves like it... what the crap should we do about its damage category? TTEchidna 19:03, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

How do moves like Shadow Blitz manage to evade the bum categories anyway? If we only knew, we could give the same treatment to the PMD- and PMD2-exclusive moves...--Shiningpikablu252 21:10, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Wouldn't this fit better under Glitches or Secrets? I'm not too sure that dummied-out TMs or moves that are only useable with a hack should fall under MoveDex. Vekter 17:13, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Well, Struggle is given its contest data, so eh. If it's dummied out but still a valid move... I say keep it with movedex. Unlike the move TM55, it's a real move. TTEchidna 22:40, 22 April 2008 (UTC)