Talk:Latias (Pokémon): Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Arceus) |
Lovely Rose (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
::Then some should change Latios's version because it's trivia includes Arceus. [[User:riggins|Riggy(>0.0)>]] | ::Then some should change Latios's version because it's trivia includes Arceus. [[User:riggins|Riggy(>0.0)>]] | ||
== Latia's human Special form == | |||
Maybe we should put up a shot of her human form? [[User:Lovely Rose|Lovely Rose]] 21:58, 9 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:58, 9 May 2009
Is it worth putting in the trivia that Latias and Latios are the only legendary Pokemon confirmed by the games to be species and not individuals? Except for maybe Manaphy, since something had to have laid the egg. - Celebi96
Multiple Mew and Lugia have been seen too.1337Fire ►strike! 14:49, 21 February 2009 (UTC)- What I meant was, it's not really correct-ish because it's really possible there are others. Take Articuno, Zapdos, and Moltres in Pokémon Snap for example. 1337Fire ►strike! 14:55, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Oh, I forgot about Snap. Thanks, sorry. - Celebi96
Arceus
"Latias is one of the few non-Flying-types who can learn Fly. The others are Mew, Smeargle, Vibrava, Flygon, Latios, and Giratina."
Does that mean that Arceus counts as flying type do to plates? Riggy(>0.0)>
- Yes, Arceus can be a Flying-type due to plates, so it doesn't count. Don't forget, use four tildes to sign your posts. — THE TROM — 09:37, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Then some should change Latios's version because it's trivia includes Arceus. Riggy(>0.0)>
Latia's human Special form
Maybe we should put up a shot of her human form? Lovely Rose 21:58, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
