Talk:Metapod (Pokémon): Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Alternate Coloration: new section) |
m (→Alternate Coloration: reply) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Is it worth noting that Metapod's shiny coloration may be a reference to the games [[Red and Green]]? --[[User:Bardock|Bar]][[User_Talk:Bardock|dock]] 17:43, 1 October 2009 (UTC) | Is it worth noting that Metapod's shiny coloration may be a reference to the games [[Red and Green]]? --[[User:Bardock|Bar]][[User_Talk:Bardock|dock]] 17:43, 1 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
:No. Not everything red and green means Red and Green. Not everything gold and silver means Gold and Silver. And so on and so forth. —'''<span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="color:#000">darklord</span>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#0047AB">trom</span>]]</span>''' 01:24, 2 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:24, 2 October 2009
Is this trivia worthy?
is it worth noting that metapod is the only pokémon based on a cacoon whose name doesn't come from cacoon Turtwig A Contributions 14:48, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- I wouldn't think so. —darklordtrom 20:48, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
Alternate Coloration
Is it worth noting that Metapod's shiny coloration may be a reference to the games Red and Green? --Bardock 17:43, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- No. Not everything red and green means Red and Green. Not everything gold and silver means Gold and Silver. And so on and so forth. —darklordtrom 01:24, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
