User talk:BKG201: Difference between revisions
Kenji-girl (talk | contribs) m (Reverted edits by BKG201 (Talk) to last revision by Shiningpikablu252) |
|||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
== Unneeded Info == | == Unneeded Info == | ||
Please don't go repeatedly reinserting information removed multiple times for being redundant, like what you did on [[Pikachu (Pokémon)]]. That's edit warring, and highly frowned upon here. If you reinsert that same piece of information just one more time, you will be blocked from editing. --[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 01:40, 2 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Please listen to him. The Who's that Pokemon stuff is off-topic from the main plot of the episode and is therefore unneeded. Unless if you want to blocked then you should really stop this foolishness. -[[User:Tyler53841|Tyler53841]] 02:19, 2 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
::OK, this is going too far. This is your final warning. Insert "<so-and-so Pokémon> was [[Who's That Pokémon?]] in <so-and-so episode>" into the trivia section of a Pokémon species article just one more time and you will be blocked. --[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 02:24, 2 October 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:48, 2 October 2009
Welcome
| |||||
|
Unneeded Info
Please don't go repeatedly reinserting information removed multiple times for being redundant, like what you did on Pikachu (Pokémon). That's edit warring, and highly frowned upon here. If you reinsert that same piece of information just one more time, you will be blocked from editing. --Shiningpikablu252 01:40, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- Please listen to him. The Who's that Pokemon stuff is off-topic from the main plot of the episode and is therefore unneeded. Unless if you want to blocked then you should really stop this foolishness. -Tyler53841 02:19, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- OK, this is going too far. This is your final warning. Insert "<so-and-so Pokémon> was Who's That Pokémon? in <so-and-so episode>" into the trivia section of a Pokémon species article just one more time and you will be blocked. --Shiningpikablu252 02:24, 2 October 2009 (UTC)