Talk:Play! Pokémon: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 6: Line 6:
::::They already have done so. [[User:Kojirojames2006|Kojirojames2006]] 8:49 PM US EDT Aug 16 2010
::::They already have done so. [[User:Kojirojames2006|Kojirojames2006]] 8:49 PM US EDT Aug 16 2010
:::::No. Only time was in the article. Everywhere else it's still the OP logo. [http://www.pokemon.com/us/organized-play/ See here].--'''[[User:Immewnity|<span style="color:#88AADD">''immewnity''</span>]][[User talk:Immewnity|<span style="color:#627DB7">the</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Immewnity|<span style="color:#335577">mew</span>]]''' 12:51, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
:::::No. Only time was in the article. Everywhere else it's still the OP logo. [http://www.pokemon.com/us/organized-play/ See here].--'''[[User:Immewnity|<span style="color:#88AADD">''immewnity''</span>]][[User talk:Immewnity|<span style="color:#627DB7">the</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Immewnity|<span style="color:#335577">mew</span>]]''' 12:51, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
::::::I agree, at least until we get more info about this.--[[User:Fern 24|<span style="color:#228b22">Fe<span style="color:#0CD;">rn</span></span>]] [[User talk:Fern 24|<span style="color:#B22222;">2<span style="color:#ED9121;">4</span></span>]] 17:31, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:31, 18 August 2010

Asking to merge

I officially ask that Play! Pokémon be merged with Pokémon Organized Play as changes were made there for the rebrand, and the name of Play! Pokémon be used for the merged items. Kojirojames2006 10:57 PM US EDT Aug 45 2010

I agree with the idea of a merger. Is there anything different besides the name and logo change? --ZestyCactus 03:34, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
I agree, too. Why wasn't the old page just moved? TTEchidna 08:05, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
I'd say merge once TPCi starts using the new logo instead of the old one on pokemon.com .--immewnitythemew 21:15, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
They already have done so. Kojirojames2006 8:49 PM US EDT Aug 16 2010
No. Only time was in the article. Everywhere else it's still the OP logo. See here.--immewnitythemew 12:51, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
I agree, at least until we get more info about this.--Fern 24 17:31, 18 August 2010 (UTC)