Talk:Pikachu (Pokémon)/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Purimpopoie (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*Altough I think the trivia section is a little messy. I'm for.--[[User:Gagaromamah | <span style="color:#DAA520">''Gaga''</span>]][[User talk:Gagaromamah|<span style="color:#C0C0C0">romamah</span>]], Your Little Monster 06:07, 12 October 2010 (UTC) | *Altough I think the trivia section is a little messy. I'm for.--[[User:Gagaromamah | <span style="color:#DAA520">''Gaga''</span>]][[User talk:Gagaromamah|<span style="color:#C0C0C0">romamah</span>]], Your Little Monster 06:07, 12 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
* Support. It is without a question the best article about a Pokémon on here. The Trivia section seems OK to me, and if it doesn't, nothing that a few edits can't fix. The {{tt|Mascot|Or something like that...}} of the series deserves a place in there. --[[User:Shinytwo|Shinytwo]] 18:19, 12 October 2010 (UTC) | * Support. It is without a question the best article about a Pokémon on here. The Trivia section seems OK to me, and if it doesn't, nothing that a few edits can't fix. The {{tt|Mascot|Or something like that...}} of the series deserves a place in there. --[[User:Shinytwo|Shinytwo]] 18:19, 12 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
* Although I was going to vote against for the trivia section, the fixed-up version looks tons better, so I think it should be a featured article now. --[[User:Purimpopoie|Purimpopoie]] 18:34, 12 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
====Object (3)==== | ====Object (3)==== | ||
Revision as of 18:34, 12 October 2010
Pikachu (Pokémon)
Support (7)
- This is an extremely detailed and accurate article. Bulbapedia needs a Pokémon species article as a FA because that's what Bulbapedia is all about. What better Pokémon to represent Bulbapedia than the most well known of them all, Pikachu?--Alex726contributions 02:18, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Maybe Bulbasaur? 梅子❀✿ 02:35, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Bulbasaur was already nominated and did not get voted in as a FA. Even if Bulbasaur literally represents Bulbapedia, it's article is not as detailed as Pikachu's. I am not playing favorites. I'm just stating my opinion that Pikachu's article is better than Bulbasaur's.--Alex726contributions 02:44, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support. I'm not fan of Pikachu, but it is time to have a Pokémon as FA and Pikachu has the best article of them.--でんのう ☢ Zえんし 06:48, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- This is my first time voting, so I could be wrong, but I can't see anything disqualifying about this article. --☯ *Ɣℯ№ӎօṫհ* ☯ 19:56, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- I have to agree, I say it deserves to be one (I mean it is the "unofficial" mascot....) Ataro 22:57, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- I agree with all of the above. This is a very organised and well written article. There's tons of great trivia and it's about time a pokémon article got a FA. Pokemaster97 18:48, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Altough I think the trivia section is a little messy. I'm for.-- Gagaromamah, Your Little Monster 06:07, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support. It is without a question the best article about a Pokémon on here. The Trivia section seems OK to me, and if it doesn't, nothing that a few edits can't fix. The Mascot of the series deserves a place in there. --Shinytwo 18:19, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Although I was going to vote against for the trivia section, the fixed-up version looks tons better, so I think it should be a featured article now. --Purimpopoie 18:34, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
Object (3)
- The trivia section is way too disorganized. It's Turtwig A! My talk or wiki edits 02:20, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Per Turtwig A, Epicsnail 17:08, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, no. Too disorganized. CuboneKing 01:05, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
