Talk:Sacred Fire (move): Difference between revisions
(→Intro) |
(→Trivia: new section) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:Then you should do it... the page isn't protected from editing... you would just need to explain why you changed it in your edit summary. -[[User:Sketch|Sketch]] 19:56, 25 July 2010 (UTC) | :Then you should do it... the page isn't protected from editing... you would just need to explain why you changed it in your edit summary. -[[User:Sketch|Sketch]] 19:56, 25 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
::I decided I might be wrong about these things, so I´m going to leave it up to someone else to decide --[[User:SHoggard|sHoggard - rookie Pokéwiz]] 21:46, 29 July 2010 (UTC) | ::I decided I might be wrong about these things, so I´m going to leave it up to someone else to decide --[[User:SHoggard|sHoggard - rookie Pokéwiz]] 21:46, 29 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Trivia == | |||
Is it worth noting that this move, along with only 8 others, has a 50% chance of a secondary effect happening? And that 6 of them are, or at least have been (Crush Claw), signature moves? '''<big><span style="color:#B8B8D0;">--</span></big>[[User:LimeGreenCharizard|<span style="color:#008000;">LimeGreen</span>]]''[[User talk:LimeGreenCharizard|<span style="color:#FF8C00;">Charizard</span>]]<big><span style="color:#B8B8D0;">--</span></big>''''' 15:06, 31 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:06, 31 October 2011
I think this part in the Trivia section is quite unnecessary:
"Sacred Fire is the only damaging attack with a chance of burning the opponent greater than 30%. "
Instead, I would like to change the following sentence
"Unlike most moves that can cause status problems, this move has a 50% chance of burning the opponent, as opposed to the usual 10%-30%. "
to
"Unlike all other moves that can cause status problems, this move has a 50% chance of burning the opponent, as opposed to the usual 10%-30%. "
But I want at least some kind of confirmation or someone to agree with me on this change. --sHoggard - rookie Pokéwiz 19:50, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
- Then you should do it... the page isn't protected from editing... you would just need to explain why you changed it in your edit summary. -Sketch 19:56, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
- I decided I might be wrong about these things, so I´m going to leave it up to someone else to decide --sHoggard - rookie Pokéwiz 21:46, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Trivia
Is it worth noting that this move, along with only 8 others, has a 50% chance of a secondary effect happening? And that 6 of them are, or at least have been (Crush Claw), signature moves? --LimeGreenCharizard-- 15:06, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
