Talk:Sacred Fire (move): Difference between revisions
(→Trivia: new section) |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Trivia == | |||
I think this part in the Trivia section is quite unnecessary: | I think this part in the Trivia section is quite unnecessary: | ||
Revision as of 15:09, 31 October 2011
Trivia
I think this part in the Trivia section is quite unnecessary:
"Sacred Fire is the only damaging attack with a chance of burning the opponent greater than 30%. "
Instead, I would like to change the following sentence
"Unlike most moves that can cause status problems, this move has a 50% chance of burning the opponent, as opposed to the usual 10%-30%. "
to
"Unlike all other moves that can cause status problems, this move has a 50% chance of burning the opponent, as opposed to the usual 10%-30%. "
But I want at least some kind of confirmation or someone to agree with me on this change. --sHoggard - rookie Pokéwiz 19:50, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
- Then you should do it... the page isn't protected from editing... you would just need to explain why you changed it in your edit summary. -Sketch 19:56, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
- I decided I might be wrong about these things, so I´m going to leave it up to someone else to decide --sHoggard - rookie Pokéwiz 21:46, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Trivia
Is it worth noting that this move, along with only 8 others, has a 50% chance of a secondary effect happening? And that 6 of them are, or at least have been (Crush Claw), signature moves? --LimeGreenCharizard-- 15:06, 31 October 2011 (UTC)