Talk:Sacred Fire (move): Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:
== Trivia ==
== Trivia ==


Is it worth noting that this move, along with only 8 others, has a 50% chance of a secondary effect happening? And that 6 of them are, or at least have been (Crush Claw), signature moves? '''<big><span style="color:#B8B8D0;">--</span></big>[[User:LimeGreenCharizard|<span style="color:#008000;">LimeGreen</span>]]''[[User talk:LimeGreenCharizard|<span style="color:#FF8C00;">Charizard</span>]]<big><span style="color:#B8B8D0;">--</span></big>''''' 15:06, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Is it worth noting that this move, along with only 7 others, has a 50% chance of a secondary effect happening? And that 6 of them are, or at least have been (Crush Claw), signature moves? '''<big><span style="color:#B8B8D0;">--</span></big>[[User:LimeGreenCharizard|<span style="color:#008000;">LimeGreen</span>]]''[[User talk:LimeGreenCharizard|<span style="color:#FF8C00;">Charizard</span>]]<big><span style="color:#B8B8D0;">--</span></big>''''' 15:06, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:38, 31 October 2011

Trivia

I think this part in the Trivia section is quite unnecessary:

"Sacred Fire is the only damaging attack with a chance of burning the opponent greater than 30%. "

Instead, I would like to change the following sentence

"Unlike most moves that can cause status problems, this move has a 50% chance of burning the opponent, as opposed to the usual 10%-30%. "

to

"Unlike all other moves that can cause status problems, this move has a 50% chance of burning the opponent, as opposed to the usual 10%-30%. "

But I want at least some kind of confirmation or someone to agree with me on this change. --sHoggard - rookie Pokéwiz 19:50, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Then you should do it... the page isn't protected from editing... you would just need to explain why you changed it in your edit summary. -Sketch 19:56, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
I decided I might be wrong about these things, so I´m going to leave it up to someone else to decide --sHoggard - rookie Pokéwiz 21:46, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Trivia

Is it worth noting that this move, along with only 7 others, has a 50% chance of a secondary effect happening? And that 6 of them are, or at least have been (Crush Claw), signature moves? --LimeGreenCharizard-- 15:06, 31 October 2011 (UTC)