Category talk:Pokémon: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Latest comment: 4 January 2014 by Tiddlywinks in topic Pseudo?
No edit summary |
Tiddlywinks (talk | contribs) m →Pseudo? |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
[[User:Irtehmrepic|Irtehmrepic]] ([[User talk:Irtehmrepic|talk]]) 21:10, 4 January 2014 (UTC) | [[User:Irtehmrepic|Irtehmrepic]] ([[User talk:Irtehmrepic|talk]]) 21:10, 4 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
:We already have a page for [[Pseudo-legendary Pokémon]]. [[User:Glik|Glik]] ([[User talk:Glik|talk]]) 21:13, 4 January 2014 (UTC) | :We already have a page for [[Pseudo-legendary Pokémon]]. [[User:Glik|Glik]] ([[User talk:Glik|talk]]) 21:13, 4 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
::And if that page weren't protected, I'd have just thrown this category on there, so it'd show up here. Maybe a staff member would do that? It seems reasonable...unless we don't want that since it's an unofficial classification/name. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 21:33, 4 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:33, 4 January 2014
Pseudo?
I feel that we should have a pseudo-legendary list, because pseudo-legendaries are a class in many areas of Pokemon. Irtehmrepic (talk) 21:10, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
- We already have a page for Pseudo-legendary Pokémon. Glik (talk) 21:13, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
- And if that page weren't protected, I'd have just thrown this category on there, so it'd show up here. Maybe a staff member would do that? It seems reasonable...unless we don't want that since it's an unofficial classification/name. Tiddlywinks (talk) 21:33, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
