User talk:Danny199: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Force Fire (talk | contribs) (→Talk pages discussions: new section) |
|||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
Don't reply to discussions that are over 6 months old as the discussion may have either been resolved or the user who asked is no longer around, making the response pointless. While the discussion for Nate is technically open, it's a discussions from 2012, so I think it's best to just make a new section.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#AB2813">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#C87365">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#26649C">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#729ABF">ire</span>]] 13:54, 22 December 2015 (UTC) | Don't reply to discussions that are over 6 months old as the discussion may have either been resolved or the user who asked is no longer around, making the response pointless. While the discussion for Nate is technically open, it's a discussions from 2012, so I think it's best to just make a new section.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#AB2813">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#C87365">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#26649C">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#729ABF">ire</span>]] 13:54, 22 December 2015 (UTC) | ||
: Thanks for the information, I thought it wouldn't be needed to have two sections about the same discussion. [[User:Danny199|Danny199]] ([[User talk:Danny199|talk]]) 14:03, 22 December 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:03, 22 December 2015
Welcome to Bulbapedia, Danny199! | |
By creating your account you are now able to edit pages, join discussions, and expand the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia. Before you jump in, here are some ground rules:
| |
Thank you, and have a good time editing here! |
Talk pages discussions
Don't reply to discussions that are over 6 months old as the discussion may have either been resolved or the user who asked is no longer around, making the response pointless. While the discussion for Nate is technically open, it's a discussions from 2012, so I think it's best to just make a new section.--ForceFire 13:54, 22 December 2015 (UTC)