Talk:Cosmoem (Pokémon): Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Just throwing this out there, everything I've seen says that Cosmovum is not its official Japanese name, there are no characters that'd indicate a "v" being in there. Cosmovum is however its French and German name. --[[User:TheMaskedMeowth|TheMaskedMeowth]] ([[User talk:TheMaskedMeowth|talk]]) 07:19, 8 December 2016 (UTC) | Just throwing this out there, everything I've seen says that Cosmovum is not its official Japanese name, there are no characters that'd indicate a "v" being in there. Cosmovum is however its French and German name. --[[User:TheMaskedMeowth|TheMaskedMeowth]] ([[User talk:TheMaskedMeowth|talk]]) 07:19, 8 December 2016 (UTC) | ||
:[http://i.imgur.com/SqSm8CB.gif The trademark filing romanizes it as "Cosmovum".] --[[User:Abcboy|Abcboy]] ([[User talk:Abcboy|talk]]) 09:13, 8 December 2016 (UTC) | :[http://i.imgur.com/SqSm8CB.gif The trademark filing romanizes it as "Cosmovum".] --[[User:Abcboy|Abcboy]] ([[User talk:Abcboy|talk]]) 09:13, 8 December 2016 (UTC) | ||
Anyone else think that Cosmoem's design also incorporates a stylized eye? (Gold as the sclera, blue for the iris, black for the pupil.) Would that be worth including in the description or design sections? | |||
[[User:Luprand|Luprand]] ([[User talk:Luprand|talk]]) 04:10, 13 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:10, 13 December 2016
Just throwing this out there, everything I've seen says that Cosmovum is not its official Japanese name, there are no characters that'd indicate a "v" being in there. Cosmovum is however its French and German name. --TheMaskedMeowth (talk) 07:19, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- The trademark filing romanizes it as "Cosmovum". --Abcboy (talk) 09:13, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Anyone else think that Cosmoem's design also incorporates a stylized eye? (Gold as the sclera, blue for the iris, black for the pupil.) Would that be worth including in the description or design sections? Luprand (talk) 04:10, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
