Talk:Grookey (Pokémon): Difference between revisions
(→Name origin: new section) |
(→Origin) |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
::If it weren't a starter, yeah, the Barbary Macaque would be the first thing for inspiration but I mainly bring up Mesopithecus since it fits the starter thematic guidelines. Grass type starters are always based on extinct animals. [[User:Burgrr|Burgrr]] ([[User talk:Burgrr|talk]]) 02:52, 28 February 2019 (UTC) | ::If it weren't a starter, yeah, the Barbary Macaque would be the first thing for inspiration but I mainly bring up Mesopithecus since it fits the starter thematic guidelines. Grass type starters are always based on extinct animals. [[User:Burgrr|Burgrr]] ([[User talk:Burgrr|talk]]) 02:52, 28 February 2019 (UTC) | ||
::: Chespin and Rowlet aren't based on extinct animals at all, and Treecko, Turtwig, and Snivy don't appear to be based on extinct animals (although it's less certain). I think you're confusing "based on extinct animals" with "based on reptiles" (although even that failed when Chespin was introduced). [[User:Aielyn|Aielyn]] ([[User talk:Aielyn|talk]]) 05:51, 28 February 2019 (UTC) | |||
== Name origin == | == Name origin == | ||
Can its name also incorporate "grass" and "ook" (as in monkey's cry)? [[User:Kikugi|Kikugi]] ([[User talk:Kikugi|talk]]) 05:26, 28 February 2019 (UTC) | Can its name also incorporate "grass" and "ook" (as in monkey's cry)? [[User:Kikugi|Kikugi]] ([[User talk:Kikugi|talk]]) 05:26, 28 February 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:51, 28 February 2019
Pokedex entry
Need to create a "Gen VIII" case in the Template:Dex/Gen and add "Sword" and "Shield" version cases to Template:Dex/Entry2. — Rmkane (talk) 18:20, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- That's clearly not a dex entry. That's just a description of the Pokémon. The descriptions are more suited for the biology section.--ForceFire 05:04, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
===Pokédex entries=== {{Dex/Header|type=Grass}} {{Dex/Gen|gen=VIII}} {{Dex/Entry2|v=Sword|v2=Shield|t=FFF|t2=FFF|entry=A mischievous Chimp Pokémon that is full of boundless curiosity.}} |} |} {{Dex/Footer}}
Pokédex entries
|
Confusing Wording
Saying that they were introduced in Gen VII may be confusing to some people. While technically correct, it makes it seem like they're Gen VII Pokémon when they're actually Gen VIII Pokémon. This should be changed to prevent confusion. — Arqade (talk) 00:16, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Origin
I heavily doubt that this is based on a squirrel monkey, especially considering that it's a living species from Ecuador, far from the basis of the region. It's much more likely to be based on Mesopithecus, given their range matching the region's inspiration (Europe and namely the UK) and fitting the themes of grass type starters being extinct animals. Burgrr (talk) 02:12, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
- May they have also been based on [1], given they're "the only free-living primates in Europe" after humans? Also, and apologies if a discussion about their name origin should belong in a separate topic thread, but I think it's worth mentioning that the "nori" of their Japanese name may also be a reference to "nori", a type of seaweed used to wrap sushi.--Garr9988 (talk) 02:28, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
- Chespin and Rowlet aren't based on extinct animals at all, and Treecko, Turtwig, and Snivy don't appear to be based on extinct animals (although it's less certain). I think you're confusing "based on extinct animals" with "based on reptiles" (although even that failed when Chespin was introduced). Aielyn (talk) 05:51, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Name origin
Can its name also incorporate "grass" and "ook" (as in monkey's cry)? Kikugi (talk) 05:26, 28 February 2019 (UTC)