Talk:Cut (move): Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Split) |
Dannyboy601 (talk | contribs) (→Split) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:Good point. Not a bad idea. --[[User:FinnishPokéFan92|FinnishPokéFan92]] ([[User talk:FinnishPokéFan92|talk]]) 14:44, 8 June 2019 (UTC) | :Good point. Not a bad idea. --[[User:FinnishPokéFan92|FinnishPokéFan92]] ([[User talk:FinnishPokéFan92|talk]]) 14:44, 8 June 2019 (UTC) | ||
::I have nothing against the split, but I wonder if we would have enough information to fill a whole page about cuttable plants. Other than the locations of the trees and bushes, there doesn't seem to be much more, because unlike the breakable rocks and headbutt trees, you can't find any Pokémon or items by cutting them. However, if we get enough content for the page, I'm all for it. --[[User:Suic12-|Suic]] ([[User talk:Suic12-|talk]]) 17:33, 8 June 2019 (UTC) | ::I have nothing against the split, but I wonder if we would have enough information to fill a whole page about cuttable plants. Other than the locations of the trees and bushes, there doesn't seem to be much more, because unlike the breakable rocks and headbutt trees, you can't find any Pokémon or items by cutting them. However, if we get enough content for the page, I'm all for it. --[[User:Suic12-|Suic]] ([[User talk:Suic12-|talk]]) 17:33, 8 June 2019 (UTC) | ||
:::I think that a list of locations would be enough, honestly. It's better than having no page at all, in which case we'd either have to continue not listing the locations anywhere, or list them on this page, which would take up a lot of space. ~ [[User:Dannyboy601|Dannyboy601]] ([[User talk:Dannyboy601|talk]]) 02:02, 9 June 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:02, 9 June 2019
Harrison's Kecleon
If Harrison's Kecleon knows Cut, then how come it's not on this page? Did it not use it in the Anime? - unsigned comment from Dirakio (talk • contribs)
Field Use Image
The image given for its usage in Black and White seems slightly pointless, considering that the move isn't actually being used. All the image shows is the player next to a tree. I think that either the image should be removed or replaced with an image that really does show Cut being used in the field. --Squirrelfeet 13:20, December 25 2011 (UTC)
- It's animated; an apng, and some browsers don't animate them. Should probably check into that. However, it should have the attack being used as the first frame for people without applicable browsers. We'll look into it. ★Jo the Marten★ ಠ_ಠ♥ 13:23, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Split
Since the plants can now also be cut by the Secret Technique Chop Down, I think it makes the most sense to split the objects themselves to their own page, like breakable rock and Headbutt tree. --SnorlaxMonster 14:39, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- Good point. Not a bad idea. --FinnishPokéFan92 (talk) 14:44, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- I have nothing against the split, but I wonder if we would have enough information to fill a whole page about cuttable plants. Other than the locations of the trees and bushes, there doesn't seem to be much more, because unlike the breakable rocks and headbutt trees, you can't find any Pokémon or items by cutting them. However, if we get enough content for the page, I'm all for it. --Suic (talk) 17:33, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- I think that a list of locations would be enough, honestly. It's better than having no page at all, in which case we'd either have to continue not listing the locations anywhere, or list them on this page, which would take up a lot of space. ~ Dannyboy601 (talk) 02:02, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
- I have nothing against the split, but I wonder if we would have enough information to fill a whole page about cuttable plants. Other than the locations of the trees and bushes, there doesn't seem to be much more, because unlike the breakable rocks and headbutt trees, you can't find any Pokémon or items by cutting them. However, if we get enough content for the page, I'm all for it. --Suic (talk) 17:33, 8 June 2019 (UTC)