Talk:Pokémon category: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Someone Else (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:::Okay, I made the page [[List of Pokémon by species]], which does just that. --[[User:Someone Else|Someone Else]] 17:27, 14 March 2008 (UTC) | :::Okay, I made the page [[List of Pokémon by species]], which does just that. --[[User:Someone Else|Someone Else]] 17:27, 14 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
::::That's not a ''sortable'' list... That's... that's... I don't even know what to call that. I said sortable, not sort them into it. You know, sortable, like the [[List of Berries by growth time]] or something. '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000">''TTE''</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|chidna]][[Image:Ani155MS.gif|Fire echy]]''' 20:04, 14 March 2008 (UTC) | ::::That's not a ''sortable'' list... That's... that's... I don't even know what to call that. I said sortable, not sort them into it. You know, sortable, like the [[List of Berries by growth time]] or something. '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000">''TTE''</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|chidna]][[Image:Ani155MS.gif|Fire echy]]''' 20:04, 14 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::::Oh, right. Uh, okay. I guess the new page wasn't ''totally'' necessary then... Though it doesn't hurt to have Pokémon sorted like that, does it? --[[User:Someone Else|Someone Else]] 22:53, 14 March 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:53, 14 March 2008
??????????
Should ??????????'s species (UNKNOWN POKEMON) be added?
I don't think so. It's not in any of the other lists of Pokémon, because it's not really a Pokémon, just blank data. --TTEchidna 23:24, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Should Pokémon with the same classification be together?
Example: Pikachu and Rattata, Mouse Pokémon. User:Stinkoman/Sig
- I think it'd be a cool idea to add the same species together like that, but then we'd get some strange ones, like Chansey and Exeggcute who are both "Egg Pokémon" and Lanturn and Ampharos, both "Light Pokémon". I'm all up for it, though, it'd be interesting to see how many Pokémon share the same species name. --Someone Else 02:35, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- Just make it a sortable list... User:TTEchidna/sig 06:19, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, I made the page List of Pokémon by species, which does just that. --Someone Else 17:27, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- That's not a sortable list... That's... that's... I don't even know what to call that. I said sortable, not sort them into it. You know, sortable, like the List of Berries by growth time or something. TTEchidnaFire echy 20:04, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, right. Uh, okay. I guess the new page wasn't totally necessary then... Though it doesn't hurt to have Pokémon sorted like that, does it? --Someone Else 22:53, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- That's not a sortable list... That's... that's... I don't even know what to call that. I said sortable, not sort them into it. You know, sortable, like the List of Berries by growth time or something. TTEchidnaFire echy 20:04, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, I made the page List of Pokémon by species, which does just that. --Someone Else 17:27, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- Just make it a sortable list... User:TTEchidna/sig 06:19, 3 February 2008 (UTC)