Talk:Localization: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Fan speculation: new section) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Fan speculation == | == Fan speculation == | ||
Currently there's the warning at the top saying"This article contains fan speculation." / "There is no solid evidence for or against some parts of this article." | Currently there's the warning at the top saying "This article contains fan speculation." / "There is no solid evidence for or against some parts of this article." | ||
What parts of the article might qualify as fan speculation? Maybe we can remove the fan speculation? It seems most of the article consists of objective facts like "This thing originally found in Japanese was changed in the international versions". --[[User:Daniel Carrero|Daniel Carrero]] ([[User talk:Daniel Carrero|talk]]) 22:58, 6 July 2022 (UTC) | What parts of the article might qualify as fan speculation? Maybe we can remove the fan speculation? It seems most of the article consists of objective facts like "This thing originally found in Japanese was changed in the international versions". --[[User:Daniel Carrero|Daniel Carrero]] ([[User talk:Daniel Carrero|talk]]) 22:58, 6 July 2022 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:58, 6 July 2022
Localization?
From this article's history, I can see that this was moved from "List of localization differences in the Pokémon games" to this title? Why was that? (I'm inclined to believe that might be a better title!?) Nescientist (talk) 16:16, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
- It was "List of regional changes in the Pokémon games" when you sent this message. I'm thinking maybe "regional" makes it a bit confusing because it may imply regions such as Kanto, Johto, etc. For now I moved it to "List of localization changes in the Pokémon games". --Daniel Carrero (talk) 14:52, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Fan speculation
Currently there's the warning at the top saying "This article contains fan speculation." / "There is no solid evidence for or against some parts of this article."
What parts of the article might qualify as fan speculation? Maybe we can remove the fan speculation? It seems most of the article consists of objective facts like "This thing originally found in Japanese was changed in the international versions". --Daniel Carrero (talk) 22:58, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
