Talk:Revavroom (Pokémon): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
YutoMaikeru (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:::::Yeah I agree {{unsigned|Lugia+Ho-Oh}} | :::::Yeah I agree {{unsigned|Lugia+Ho-Oh}} | ||
::::::I agree with splitting it and leaving the Starmobiles completely out of the infobox. --[[User:Mr. Bonding|Mr. Bonding]] ([[User talk:Mr. Bonding|talk]]) 01:16, 3 January 2023 (UTC) | ::::::I agree with splitting it and leaving the Starmobiles completely out of the infobox. --[[User:Mr. Bonding|Mr. Bonding]] ([[User talk:Mr. Bonding|talk]]) 01:16, 3 January 2023 (UTC) | ||
:::::::I definitely see no reason the Starmobile shouldn't receive its own page along with cleaning up Revavroom's infobox.--[[User:YutoMaikeru|<span style="font-family:Papyrus"><font color="6FB82B">'''YutoMaikeru'''</font>]] ([[User talk:YutoMaikeru|talk]]) 01:45, 3 January 2023 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 01:45, 3 January 2023
Regarding the Starmobile split suggestion
Hi! So yeah i'm the guy who suggested that split. Basically my reasoning is that 1) having the Starmobile info on the Revavroom species page makes it feel really cluttered, 2) the Starmobile-related info on the page are very SV-specific and would be better split into their own page (eg. the other mon character pages we've made like Koraidon (game), Miraidon (game), Arceus (game), etc.). Hence why i think these info should have their own dedicated Starmobile page.
We can keep some of the lore on the Revavroom page (eg. Ortega designing the Starmobiles) but that should be about it i think. With a dedicated page, we can get into much more detail regarding the game mechanics like mobile's moves, Abilities, names, etc too. Anzasquiddles (talk) 16:57, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- The Starmobiles having their own page makes sense. Plus given they are unique main story bosses, it will be easier to find and less clutter. So I support this.--Jacob9594 (talk) 18:51, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- Hi yes we should definitely do this because the page is ugly and cluttered now. Who even thought that the current design would be okay; it hurts my eyes. Gentleflipper (talk) 12:06, 16 December 2022 (UTC)Gentleflipper
- I do think it should be split, especially because they can't be obtained in any way. ¿¡Unowninator?! (talk) 00:50, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- We have a page on Eternamax and Ultra Burst so I don't see any reason why we couldn't have an article about the Starmobile, unless we want to wait and see if it appears in the anime or TCG or what have you. The Starmobiles even have some story significance so it's not like we have nothing to say about them beyond game data. I also think it would be a good place to put information about its name in other languages (rather than that info's current place on the Team Star page). Landfish7 08:35, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah I agree - unsigned comment from Lugia+Ho-Oh (talk • contribs)
- I agree with splitting it and leaving the Starmobiles completely out of the infobox. --Mr. Bonding (talk) 01:16, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
- I definitely see no reason the Starmobile shouldn't receive its own page along with cleaning up Revavroom's infobox.--YutoMaikeru (talk) 01:45, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
- I agree with splitting it and leaving the Starmobiles completely out of the infobox. --Mr. Bonding (talk) 01:16, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah I agree - unsigned comment from Lugia+Ho-Oh (talk • contribs)
- We have a page on Eternamax and Ultra Burst so I don't see any reason why we couldn't have an article about the Starmobile, unless we want to wait and see if it appears in the anime or TCG or what have you. The Starmobiles even have some story significance so it's not like we have nothing to say about them beyond game data. I also think it would be a good place to put information about its name in other languages (rather than that info's current place on the Team Star page). Landfish7 08:35, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
- I do think it should be split, especially because they can't be obtained in any way. ¿¡Unowninator?! (talk) 00:50, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- Hi yes we should definitely do this because the page is ugly and cluttered now. Who even thought that the current design would be okay; it hurts my eyes. Gentleflipper (talk) 12:06, 16 December 2022 (UTC)Gentleflipper