Talk:Unnamed Third Set (TFG): Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Suggesting move to uncapitalize the name: TFG dabtag doesn't seem problematic to me) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:Sounds good, I would support this move too. --[[User:Daniel Carrero|Daniel Carrero]] ([[User talk:Daniel Carrero|talk]]) 23:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC) | :Sounds good, I would support this move too. --[[User:Daniel Carrero|Daniel Carrero]] ([[User talk:Daniel Carrero|talk]]) 23:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC) | ||
::I think it would make sense to uncapitalize the title. However, I also wonder whether "Unnamed third TFG set" would be a better title. There's no other "unnamed third set" it is being distinguished from, so it doesn't really make sense to have a "TFG" dabtag. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 09:51, 23 March 2024 (UTC) | ::I think it would make sense to uncapitalize the title. However, I also wonder whether "Unnamed third TFG set" would be a better title. There's no other "unnamed third set" it is being distinguished from, so it doesn't really make sense to have a "TFG" dabtag. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 09:51, 23 March 2024 (UTC) | ||
:::The TFG dabtag seems to be trying to mimic the TCG dabtag, even if there's nothing to distinguish from. For example, "[[Groundbreakers (TFG)]]" is called that despite no other "Groundbreakers" existing (typing that term in search just redirects to "Groundbreakers (TFG)"). I think we should keep the TFG dabtag for consistency. --[[User:Boblers|Boblers]] ([[User talk:Boblers|talk]]) 10:14, 23 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:15, 23 March 2024
Gold spaces
Is there any idea, speculation, or concept of what the gold spaces would have done in the TFG? Maybe even a wild guess? I really want to get some friends together and play this game. - unsigned comment from Phantasm1234 (talk • contribs)
Suggesting move to uncapitalize the name
There's a notice on the page that the set has no official name, so it seems incorrect to be capitalizing "Unnamed Third Set" it as if it is official. --Boblers (talk) 02:22, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed, I would support this move. --Apopheniac (talk) 23:20, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Sounds good, I would support this move too. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 23:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- I think it would make sense to uncapitalize the title. However, I also wonder whether "Unnamed third TFG set" would be a better title. There's no other "unnamed third set" it is being distinguished from, so it doesn't really make sense to have a "TFG" dabtag. --SnorlaxMonster 09:51, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- The TFG dabtag seems to be trying to mimic the TCG dabtag, even if there's nothing to distinguish from. For example, "Groundbreakers (TFG)" is called that despite no other "Groundbreakers" existing (typing that term in search just redirects to "Groundbreakers (TFG)"). I think we should keep the TFG dabtag for consistency. --Boblers (talk) 10:14, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- I think it would make sense to uncapitalize the title. However, I also wonder whether "Unnamed third TFG set" would be a better title. There's no other "unnamed third set" it is being distinguished from, so it doesn't really make sense to have a "TFG" dabtag. --SnorlaxMonster 09:51, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
