Talk:Baxcalibur (Pokémon): Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Nidoking is based on Baragon — Tyranitar is based on Godzilla — Duraludon is based on Mechagodzilla — Baxcalibur is DEFINITELY based on Godzilla. Why are these intentionally omitted even though we are certain of this? It feels irresponsible of a wiki to intentionally omit important information like this for no reason. [[User:Buwbasaur|Buwbasaur]] ([[User talk:Buwbasaur|talk]]) 12:06, 30 April 2024 (UTC) | Nidoking is based on Baragon — Tyranitar is based on Godzilla — Duraludon is based on Mechagodzilla — Baxcalibur is DEFINITELY based on Godzilla. Why are these intentionally omitted even though we are certain of this? It feels irresponsible of a wiki to intentionally omit important information like this for no reason. [[User:Buwbasaur|Buwbasaur]] ([[User talk:Buwbasaur|talk]]) 12:06, 30 April 2024 (UTC) | ||
:Sir, we need offical soruces to comfirm they were based in that. Plus we tend to avoid mentioning certain copyrights stuff to avoid getting into trouble with offical company of Nintendo and Pokemon if I recall?--[[User:Jacob9594|Jacob9594 ]] ([[User talk:Jacob9594|talk]]) 13:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC) | :Sir, we need offical soruces to comfirm they were based in that. Plus we tend to avoid mentioning certain copyrights stuff to avoid getting into trouble with offical company of Nintendo and Pokemon if I recall?--[[User:Jacob9594|Jacob9594 ]] ([[User talk:Jacob9594|talk]]) 13:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC) | ||
::: I don't see how we'd get in trouble for that, especially with Baxcalibur being so blatant in its design, the fact this is a fan wiki, and how we never use definitive statements anyway, like "Toucannon ''may be'' a combination of the words toucan and cannon". Also, I'm a ma'am, but that's not here or there ;p [[User:Buwbasaur|Buwbasaur]] ([[User talk:Buwbasaur|talk]]) 15:29, 30 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:29, 30 April 2024
Ignoring Origins?
Nidoking is based on Baragon — Tyranitar is based on Godzilla — Duraludon is based on Mechagodzilla — Baxcalibur is DEFINITELY based on Godzilla. Why are these intentionally omitted even though we are certain of this? It feels irresponsible of a wiki to intentionally omit important information like this for no reason. Buwbasaur (talk) 12:06, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Sir, we need offical soruces to comfirm they were based in that. Plus we tend to avoid mentioning certain copyrights stuff to avoid getting into trouble with offical company of Nintendo and Pokemon if I recall?--Jacob9594 (talk) 13:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see how we'd get in trouble for that, especially with Baxcalibur being so blatant in its design, the fact this is a fan wiki, and how we never use definitive statements anyway, like "Toucannon may be a combination of the words toucan and cannon". Also, I'm a ma'am, but that's not here or there ;p Buwbasaur (talk) 15:29, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
