User talk:Transfinite: Difference between revisions
(Protection of Move pages) |
Transfinite (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
Any reason all the Move pages are blocked? Those pages are not yet ion their final form, and should be edittable by those of us who aren't sysops.[[User:User142|User142]] 10:33, 21 November 2005 (CST) | Any reason all the Move pages are blocked? Those pages are not yet ion their final form, and should be edittable by those of us who aren't sysops.[[User:User142|User142]] 10:33, 21 November 2005 (CST) | ||
:Don't ask me, I didn't even know they were. [[User:Ketsuban|Ketsuban]] 19:28, 1 December 2005 (CST) |
Revision as of 01:28, 2 December 2005
Ket! Can you maybe be a little more serious and sincere in your articles? I've gotta go through and fix all of your sarcasm. We are an encyclopedia, y'know...
- (
Just testing...
Ket!
"(OR ARE THEY!!)"? Fanon
C'mon, Ket, seriously, it's good to have fun and all, but this gets presented, and stuff like that looks bad. If you wanna talk to me on AIM about it, feel free.
~Evan
More chances to whine at you--you only bold someone's name once during an article, not with all instances of it.
But that's minor. Just lettin' ya know.
Ket, you've made some great articles. GOod information, good format. I'm pretty sure al lthat sarcasm and fun you've been having with the articles has been weeded out. As far as I can see, you've got some clean articles. Oh by the way. Hello. I doubt we've met before. ~ Tyger
My user page is going to be "inspired by" yours. Yoink! -Argy
RAARRGH.
Actually, I'm not that angry, but [[Category:Wingull]] is big-time overkill. Despite the fact that we all know you love wingull. Sorry, ket. ^^; evkl 15:07, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Your edits to Flying (type)
Please try to keep it civil. User:Jellochuu/s 00:19, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Shipping Articles
Upon creation, maybe go back to the incomplete list and linkify? Evkl 01:53, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Ooh, good idea.
Ket can you get rid of Urineshipping, please? Don't know what prompted it and I don't care. Get rid of it. It's on the list of Shipping page. I was never notified of it,. I think it's sick and I want it off the page.LedianX 17:20, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Get on AIM, please. Evkl 22:30, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Can you get on any messanger service? Evkl 02:18, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I hope that you were mocking the overzealous Pokémon fandom with that picture of Satoshi and Masamune, because, well.... erm... --Argy 06:54, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Hey
"*anger rising*"
Haha, my sentiments exactly, pretty ridiculous the whole dub mess up isn't it? - Ferret
Zhen complains
I'd appreciate it if you do not change the song title information. We're short on screen space and the translations are accessible as a both a tooltip hover and a URL in the status bar. - 振霖T 07:03, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)</nowiki>
You have just made a new enemy
I just saw that you tampered my pages. I know you from SPPf, but I'm not a user there. And if it's one more thing I hate, its Anti-Pokeshippers--like you!!! From now on, leave me the FUCK alone! Pikachu Fan Number Nine
- One more thing, Ketsuban. Change your name to Andross so Star Fox can hunt you down. Pikachu Fan Number Nine
- Ket, maybe it's just me, but your 'new enemy' isn't much to be afraid of. Maybe you should change your name to Ganon, though, as I think having Link hunt you down would be a lot more fun. Or maybe Bowser, so you can get hunted by Mario. I suppose it's really up to you. *smirks* We don't have enough fun anymore, do we? Oh boy. evkl 00:38, 18 Aug 2005 (CDT)
- Or maybe Ket is really the Aparoid Queen in disguise! Pikachu Fan Number Nine
- And then she'd be even more powerful than you. --Argy 20:58, 18 Aug 2005 (CDT)
^_^ This is funny. PF#9, I "tampered" with your pages because this is a wiki. That's how wikis work. If you don't want others to edit your work, you should go elsewhere. N00b. Ketsuban 18:10, 18 Aug 2005 (CDT)
- Hey, Ket, I've been given one more chance, I'm sorry for saying those things to you, let's start over, OK? Pikachu Fan Number Nine
- Okay, then. Ketsuban 17:01, 19 Aug 2005 (CDT)
Protection of Move pages
Any reason all the Move pages are blocked? Those pages are not yet ion their final form, and should be edittable by those of us who aren't sysops.User142 10:33, 21 November 2005 (CST)
- Don't ask me, I didn't even know they were. Ketsuban 19:28, 1 December 2005 (CST)