User talk:TTEchidna/Archive Sep 08 3

	HP: 325/360
Talk Page Archives
Aug 2006-Aug 2007 • Sept 2007 • Oct 2007 • Nov-Dec 2007 • Jan-Feb 2008 Mar-Apr 2008 • May-June 2008 • July-Aug 2008 • Sept 2008 (1 • 2 • 3) Oct 2008 (1 • 2) • Election special • November, 2008 • Dec 2008 (1 • 2) Jan 2009 (1 • 2) • Feb 2009 • Mar-Apr 2009 • May 2009 • Jun-Jul 2009 Aug-Sep 2009 • Oct 2009 • Nov-Dec 2009 • Jan-Mar 2010 • Apr-May 2010 Jun-Aug 2010 • Sep-Dec 2010

---

My trades are now a limited time offer! I may in fact offer them once again when Platinum comes out, however, I likely will not for some time.

Now. Don't make me move this page again until October!

Template Categorization project

You never responded when I asked if you could make sure I was doing it right. Suppose you didn't see it, what with everybody and their grandmother always asking you for assistance. In any case, just diff some of my contribs to make sure I'm doing it okay. Reply, and then I shall continue the categorizing. --ニョロトノ666 00:36, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Just make sure that, with subtemplates, and subtemplates of subtemplates of subtemplates... you categorize them as subtemplates. TTEchidna 00:50, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Uh... what? Give an example. --ニョロトノ666 00:54, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

This one, for example. TTEchidna 00:57, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

So, should that be categorized instead as [[Category:Movelist header templates]]? Or is it fine the way it is? --ニョロトノ666 00:58, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

No, no no. It can keep its current categorization, I just figured you could categorize all subtemplates in subtemplates, too. TTEchidna 01:00, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Will do. First, though, I'm just gonna go through them and put them in their specific categories. Then I'll go back through them and add [[Category:Subtemplates]] as well. --ニョロトノ666 01:02, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Good. TTEchidna 01:10, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Category

So, does that mean we add the XD tutors now? ht14 01:13, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Indeed it does. TTEchidna 01:28, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Template:Spe

I just noticed it. Should we be phasing out Template:Special in its favor? It's been around since March, apparently, and nobody's done anything about it since, so... --Martonimos_{((Argh|Blargh))} 07:33, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

It's basically just an alternative, like {{Giga Impact}} is to {{Hyper Beam}}. TTEchidna 20:17, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

This may just be me but...

Why is the Arceus article mainly about it's flying type?~Ποκεμανιακα0β 22:26, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Probably because it's the only Pokémon that can be a pure Flying-type "permanently".--Blazevoir 22:34, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Unusual, and stupid. its base type is Normal...~Ποκεμανιακα0β 22:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

So? It can become any type it wants to, making it the only Pokémon to be pure Flying-type available right now.--Blazevoir 22:37, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

So what that it is a flying type? It's originally a normal type, and it can't be a flying type without a certain item (the plate). So I don't see why it is set as Flying type as default~Ποκεμανιακα0β 22:39, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Oh, you mean the sprites. TTEchidna did that. It alternates based on the time you visit it (I think; feel free to correct me if I'm wrong).--Blazevoir 22:43, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Oh...It alternates, well it's been like that for days, the only way to alternate it, is if someone edit the article every time~Ποκεμανιακα0β 22:45, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

If the article does in fact revolve around the flying type, something needs to be done. There is no reason to single out that type. --ニョロトノ666 22:58, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Ones I can think off the top is that the color scheme for the templates there is the Flying-type color. All "weakness, immunities, and all" are all "hidden" except the Flying type one which is defaultly shown. The sprite is the flying type.~Ποκεμανιακα0β 23:03, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

And I think it says that the learnset is only for Arceus with the Flying type plate~Ποκεμανιακα0β 23:04, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

I remember seeing it a week or so ago based all on the Fire type, so I'm pretty sure it's configured to be changed. Not sure how often that happens though. ←{Berrymaster|Talk|Contrib}→ 23:07, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Every second it changes. It's just cached. If you want it to change, click here, that'll purge the wiki's internal cache. If the page weren't cached, however, it would change every second. Having said that, Arceus is a  Rock-type  Pokémon, and only the plate can change that. TTEchidna 03:51, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Whew

My account is fixed, please delete the currently blocked User talk:KUKI--KukiTalk 23:09, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Done. --ニョロトノ666 23:30, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Talk page abuse.

There is some talk page abuse taking place here: http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Talk:Veronica_Taylor The discussion is not related to improving the page in any form. Trainer-c 12:42, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

While PTL's addition to the talk page may be a bit biased, she was answering a question posed. It's not really abuse unless it's something like "hay guiz itd be kool if ash got charzard bak and used him in sino to beet paul". I asked the question in anticipation of May's return, which I knew might heavily alter the article, and wanted to know if she'd said anything about returning, just to make sure my protection of the article wasn't in vain. TTEchidna 18:16, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi TTEchidna! It's a good thing that you protected Veronica's Talk page! ^^ It was getting a bit out of hand, when ケンジのガール (whoever that person is) began arguing with me, just cause I love the 4Kids dub so much. Anyway, I just wanted to let you know that everything I said on Veronica's Talk page is indeed true. I did receive a recent email from Veronica, making that statement which I quoted. Also, like I said, contracts aren't an issue for Veronica now, and they never prevented the original cast from returning in the first place (despite what some people might tell you). So basically, I just wanted you to know that I wasn't making anything up. Also, one last thing. I must clarify something that ケンジのガール has said: "Veronica said that she didn't want to return" - I really wish people wouldn't make up rumors like this about the original cast. This just shows people's own ignorance for starting/believing those rumors. Because anyone who knows Veronica, knows that she has always wanted to return to Pokemon again and voice Ash (and May). In fact, she would do this in a heartbeat, if she could! Anyway, I didn't mean for my comment to be this long. But thank you for hearing me out, TTEchidna. I was happy to answer your question! In the future, if you or anyone else has questions about Veronica, feel free to ask on my Talk Page on Bulbapedia or PM me on the forums. ^_^ --PokemonTrainerLisa 12:59, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Hey

Can you protect my talk page archives? I don't want anyone touching them. --Baby G (talk to me) (see my edits) 00:04, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Done. TTEchidna 00:06, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Footprint

What's with the footprints in the Pokémon pages? Are they new or something? tc26 00:31, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

They were new eight years ago. We're gonna be adding them to the Pokémon pages, though, since they should've been here since GS. TTEchidna 00:54, 21 September 2008 (UTC)