User talk:Phocks/New Pokémon: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Why is this listed?: new section) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Why is a fan-made pokemon legitimately listed on the list of actual species? I mean, why not just add every fan-made pokemon while we're at it.[[User:Morgil27|Morgil27]] 03:36, 17 December 2008 (UTC) | Why is a fan-made pokemon legitimately listed on the list of actual species? I mean, why not just add every fan-made pokemon while we're at it.[[User:Morgil27|Morgil27]] 03:36, 17 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
:I'm not quite sure myself. ^^; [[User:Phocks|<font color="red">Ph</font>]]o[[User talk:Phocks|<font color="blue">cks</font>]]<sup color="green">Fighting against hackers.</sup> 22:53, 18 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:53, 18 December 2008
I'm sorry but I don't like the name "Phocks". It looks too much like a swear word.--Pokencyclopedia 00:16, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
It sounds like "fox" but it looks like f%*ks. I mean i kind of looks like a swear word but not that much really. --Hey1031 00:20, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Why is this listed?
Why is a fan-made pokemon legitimately listed on the list of actual species? I mean, why not just add every fan-made pokemon while we're at it.Morgil27 03:36, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
