Talk:Misty

Archives

• Archive 1

Stop removing the controversy paragraph!

Honestly, I added that in because such a thing actually existed. Heck, a high-class editor, Fabuvinny, even thought adding it in was a good idea. so please, don't remove it, especially since it was already given a greenlight by someone on the level of Fabuvinny or Kenji-girl. Weedle Mchairybug 04:35, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Evkl and TTE agreed on removing it. Like I said. -Sketch 04:36, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Hah, yeah. When we have about 10 people saying remove it, two people won't do much. ^Maverick_Nate 04:37, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Even if one of these people is basically Bulbapedia's equivalent of a veteran mod? Weedle Mchairybug 04:39, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

You know WM, many people like me were upset about Tracey leaving. May fans were upset about May leaving. And I'm sure what ever fans Max had were also upset about his departure. Do we mention them on their articles No. We were giving Misty special treatment. And don't tell me Misty is acceptable because she has a lot more fans. It's still bias. --ケンジのガール 04:40, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

You know, I think you should talk with Fabu-Vinny about the whole thing, because, guess what, he not only agreed with the statement at hand, but he even said that the fans reaction to May's removal wasn't even close to the outcry that the fans had in regards to Misty leaving. Also, Bias? Literally everything in Bulbapedia has a degree of Bias. Literally anything we say has a degree of bias. Should we just destroy this entire site just to keep it unbiased? Besides, the whole Brock/Tracey thing was a fan controversy as well, should we delete that from the site as well? Heck, how about the Togepi Controversy, the Buizel controversy? Weedle Mchairybug 04:48, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

I already deleted the Togepi contraversy. As for the Tracey/Brock thing, that is a fact as the former director stated it himself. --ケンジのガール 04:50, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

So what if it was confirmed by the former director himself, it was still an ongoing fan controversy, therefore it should be deleted. Weedle Mchairybug 04:56, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

We never stated it was a controversy. We just stated what the director said. --ケンジのガール 04:58, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Even so, the mere fact that Articles that serve nothing more than to cater to the fans/bias, and even just sentences makes me think that, if you guys should remove this to delete fan-related things/bias, why don't we just destroy this whole site? I mean, in order to achieve true unbias, we must remove all thinking, we must have the entire site be run by robots, and all that, as that's the only way something can be considered 100% unbiased in actuality. Weedle Mchairybug 05:08, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Okay, now you're not making sense anymore... All I'm saying is that we shouldn't mention a controversy of a departure of one character when we don't do it for another character.--ケンジのガール 05:14, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Even if its necesarry to talk about the controversy we really shouldn't have an entire seperate page for it. --Landfish7 15:01, 19 January 2009 (UTC)