User talk:Missingno. Master/Archive13

Missingno. Master's Talk Page Archives- DO NOT TOUCH!

The Groundhog Day countdown has been relocated to my new and improved user page! Go there to see it!

Q Glitch

The Q glitch that allows any Pokemon to get any move also causes the Pokemon to get the wrong stats and name. For example, a Magikarp that gained the move Transform from a Mew would also get Mew's stats and be nicknamed "MEW". While this can be fully fixed by evolving the Magikarp, sometimes this is not possible or not desired. Is there any way to fix this problem without evolution? Blueapple128 22:35, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Not to my knowledge, I'm afraid. Sorry. Missingno. Master wants YOU! Join the Order of the Glitch! (my talk page) 03:47, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Here's an idea (not tested): Use the Q glitch to give Magikarp's moves and stats to a Mew, have Mew learn Transform, then use the Q glitch again to give Mew's stats and moves to another Magikarp. Now the 2nd Magikarp has Transform and its regular stats. (However, this won't work if the move you are trying to teach is a starting move.) Blueapple128 18:22, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

It sounds good in theory. Unfortunately, I am at the moment unable to test anything involving Q. I'll look into it, though. Missingno. Master wants YOU! Join the Order of the Glitch! (my talk page) 23:23, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Hunter

I didn't revert you, but don't add that template to CotDs or main characters just yet. We're not sure we want that template everywhere - the main purpose of it is to replace those crappy little articles about the individual Pokémon that we've been eliminating lately. Also, next time you use the template, pay attention to the "note" parameter - it's "h" if it's the first line, "f" if it's the bottom line, or "b" if it's the only one (which is what you should've used on that page. Thanks. --electAbuzzzz 14:58, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Ah, alright. I'll keep that in mind for the future. Missingno. Master wants YOU! Join the Order of the Glitch! (my talk page) 15:51, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Dude... returned

Um, if you haven't tried using a leaf stone, you should. If not, don't guess. Go use a leaf stone, (in generation 3 games) and then come back and tell me what happens.

Point 4

it is a glitch. it is not a Pokemon. it does not have gender differences. it never did, it never will. and that goes for any other glitch. none of them have gender differences, none of them have origins, or name origins, and none of them have a habitat. this is a formal warning. if you add that crap again, you will be blocked for insubordination. deal with it. -- MAGNEDETH 17:03, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Fine. Because I don't want to be blocked, and ONLY because I don't want to be blocked, I will refrain from adding the valued information you call "crap" to the Glitch Pokémon articles. And let me say this. I take severe offense to your anti-glitch attitude. Not that I blame you-nothing of the sort. The concept of equality between all Pokémon is one that, as I've learned through experience, not everybody is open-minded enough to grasp. Tell me, do you know why I founded the Order of the Glitch? Well, it doesn't matter if you know, I'll tell you anyway. I founded the Order of the Glitch in an attempt to eliminate the close-mindedness what that disables many of you from grasping the concept of Glitch Pokémon being equal to the official ones. Now hear this. Or read this. Whatever. Though you may stifle the voice of truth on Bulbapedia, you cannot stop us. We of the Order of the Glitch will succeed in our goal! We strive for a future where h POKé is considered as real as Omastar! We strive for a future in which Misty's LM4 evolves into a Clefairy, and again into a Nidoking! We strive for a future where half the world's Pokémon fans rest their heads on official Missingno.-shaped pillows, while snuggling their plush .4! We strive for a future of open-mindedness, where the term Glitch Pokémon is made obsolete, so as to no longer denote a difference! Glitch Pokémon. Official Pokémon. There is no real difference between the two. In a perfect world, the two would be considered equal! Missingno. Master wants YOU! Join the Order of the Glitch! (my talk page) 20:56, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

i think you should seek help. -- MAGNEDETH 21:05, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

You do realize that in our world, nothing is equal, right? --^Psychic_Rider^☮ 21:06, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Also in our world, owls do not hypnotize other animals, rocks do not hover and are not alive, and weak fish do not transform into fierce dragons. Missingno. Master wants YOU! Join the Order of the Glitch! (my talk page) 21:07, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Well OK then, well, let me rephrase that...Nothing that has two parts to it is ever equal, one is always better than the other, and the other is always looked down upon...--^Psychic_Rider^☮ 21:11, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

MM, if you'll allow me to quote from the dictionary: "Glitch - 1. a defect or malfunction in a machine or plan. 2. Computers. any error, malfunction, or problem. Compare bug". Your beloved glitches, if you fail at grasping the very meaning of the word, are software errors. They are NOT Pokémon. They are mistakes. Yet, we allow them to have articles, because they're part of the game data. That does not mean you can treat them like a real part of the Pokémon world. They're program screwups. They have no origins. End of story. --electAbuzzzz 21:14, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Might I remind you that I was not even the one who came up with the name Glitch Pokémon. I am unsure by whom that term was coined, but I can be sure that they did not have a very positive view on them. Plus, as I recall, chewing gum was inadvertantly created as a result of an experiment with the purpose of developing a new kind of tire rubber. So sure Glitch Pokémon were mistakes. But so was chewing gum. Why they came to exist does not define what they are or what they can be. PsychicRider; For many things, I can understand that. But Glitch Pokémon can be battled. They can use attacks. They have set stats, some of them even have very good stats. They can be captured in Poké Balls. They have Pokédex entries. They have cries. They have sprites. They have types. In these regards, they are equal to official Pokémon, and really, what else is there? I'll tell you what else there is. Nothing but the flawed perception of them by the human mind, that's what. Missingno. Master wants YOU! Join the Order of the Glitch! (my talk page) 21:20, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

All official Pokémon are featured in other medias. glitch Pokémon, for this reason, are not worthy of being compared to official Pokémon, because they do not exist outside of one or two games. ^Maverick_Nate 21:22, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Magnedeath, wouldn't it be possible to put what programing oversights caused them to be created in the origin? I am not saying that I support immediate integration of glitches to our lives, something more subtle like having Missingno. with a small cameo in a movie here, a .4 TCG card there, and so on until glitches are accepted, if not emdraced as offical Pokémon. Also, weather or not they admit it Nintendo created glitches and are therefore responsible for them.--Mtn otter 12:50, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Oy... But... Why?

Dude. What was the point of that shiny Pokémon category, when all you did was put in the SAME articles that were in the anime shinies category? That was... Pointless. We don'y need two identical categories. Not to mention you forgot to categorize the category. And you split your edits into a million revisions. I'm deleting it. --electAbuzzzz 19:45, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Alright, but any reason you erased the lists of used moves from the list of Shiny Pokémon in the anime? Missingno. Master wants YOU! Join the Order of the Glitch! (my talk page) 00:08, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Responded on my talk page. You don't have to post twice, I would've seen it here eventually. --electAbuzzzz 00:17, 13 August 2009 (UTC)