Talk:.4/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Zesty Cactus (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
m (Actually, the E is accented and there's six periods...) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*The article is pratically empty compared to missingno or any other FAC article. ---> [[User:223david|<span style="color:#D42E2E;">'''223'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/223david|<span style="color:#B69E00;">☆</span>]][[User talk:223david|<span style="color:#2E2ED4;">'''Dåv]d'''</span>]]''' 14:07, 31 August 2009 (UTC) | *The article is pratically empty compared to missingno or any other FAC article. ---> [[User:223david|<span style="color:#D42E2E;">'''223'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/223david|<span style="color:#B69E00;">☆</span>]][[User talk:223david|<span style="color:#2E2ED4;">'''Dåv]d'''</span>]]''' 14:07, 31 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
* *yawns* A very weak article. Very bland...sorry... [[User:Ht14|<span style="color:#D5AA00"><sup>'''''ht'''''</sup></span>]][[User talk:Ht14|<span style="color:#C0C0C0"><small>''14''</small></span>]] 02:40, 1 September 2009 (UTC) | * *yawns* A very weak article. Very bland...sorry... [[User:Ht14|<span style="color:#D5AA00"><sup>'''''ht'''''</sup></span>]][[User talk:Ht14|<span style="color:#C0C0C0"><small>''14''</small></span>]] 02:40, 1 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
* What's next? [[ | * What's next? [[Ké......|Ke?]] [[User:CuboneKing|<font color="FF1111">Cu</font>]][[User talk:CuboneKing|<font color="deab79">bo</font>]][[Special:Contributions/CuboneKing|<font color="28E228">ne</font>]][[Cubone (Pokémon)|<font color="Black">King</font>]] 03:21, 1 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
* Missingno. is a featured article because it has more than four paragraphs of non-trivial text, and actually explains how and why this Pokémon appears. This one fails to meet every standard. If it's the next best thing Project GlitchDex has, then I am highly concerned. —'''<span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="color:#000">darklord</span>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#0047AB">trom</span>]]</span>''' 04:59, 1 September 2009 (UTC) | * Missingno. is a featured article because it has more than four paragraphs of non-trivial text, and actually explains how and why this Pokémon appears. This one fails to meet every standard. If it's the next best thing Project GlitchDex has, then I am highly concerned. —'''<span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="color:#000">darklord</span>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#0047AB">trom</span>]]</span>''' 04:59, 1 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
* I don't think this would be a good FA. There's nothing that really stands out about this article... it's just a regular Gen I Glitch Pokémon article. [[User:Zesty Cactus|<span style="color:#006400;">'''Zesty'''</span><span style="color:#3CB371;">'''Cactus'''</span>]] 05:03, 1 September 2009 (UTC) | * I don't think this would be a good FA. There's nothing that really stands out about this article... it's just a regular Gen I Glitch Pokémon article. [[User:Zesty Cactus|<span style="color:#006400;">'''Zesty'''</span><span style="color:#3CB371;">'''Cactus'''</span>]] 05:03, 1 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:09, 1 September 2009
.4
Support (1)
- After Missingno., probably one of the best examples of a Glitch Pokémon's page on this pedia. Informative, accurate, clean, thorough, what more is needed? Missingno. Master wants YOU! Join the Order of the Glitch! (my talk page) 11:48, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Object (10)
- Are ya kiddin' me? This thing is far from featured-worthy, as far as I can see. No content, at all. It's just an average glitch article. --electAbuzzzz 12:11, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- Compared to Missingno., as well as many (Pokémon) articles, it's practically empty. tc²₆tc26 12:26, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- Doesn't have anything to make it worth a FA title. Though, Charizard (Base Set 4) and Maddie Blaustein (on its talk page they said that it would have only a temporary status, though it's still a featured one) didn't have either. UltimateSephiroth (about me · chat · edits) 13:58, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think it has what it takes. It appears to be stub-like, Pokémon Wise. Other articles such as Brock are clean, concise, and very detailed. --Greenギャラドス 14:05, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- The article is pratically empty compared to missingno or any other FAC article. ---> 223☆Dåv]d 14:07, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- *yawns* A very weak article. Very bland...sorry... ht14 02:40, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- What's next? Ke? CuboneKing 03:21, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- Missingno. is a featured article because it has more than four paragraphs of non-trivial text, and actually explains how and why this Pokémon appears. This one fails to meet every standard. If it's the next best thing Project GlitchDex has, then I am highly concerned. —darklordtrom 04:59, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think this would be a good FA. There's nothing that really stands out about this article... it's just a regular Gen I Glitch Pokémon article. ZestyCactus 05:03, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- Agree with everything above. I wasn't for Missingno. being nominated. You think I'd like this? --ケンジのガール 05:28, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
