Talk:List of Contest opponents: Difference between revisions
(→Length) |
(→Length) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:That's not bad at all. Great stuff.--[[User:Clarky13|<span style="color:#0000FF;">'''Clarky'''</span>]][[User talk:Clarky13|<span style="color:#000000;">'''13'''</span>]] 04:55, 9 October 2009 (UTC) | :That's not bad at all. Great stuff.--[[User:Clarky13|<span style="color:#0000FF;">'''Clarky'''</span>]][[User talk:Clarky13|<span style="color:#000000;">'''13'''</span>]] 04:55, 9 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Thank you. Scratch the three-wide idea though, some like Baltoy have moves that get too many appeal points, and it throws the widths off too much for a three-wide table. [[User:Drake Clawfang|Drake Clawfang]] 04:57, 9 October 2009 (UTC) | ::Thank you. Scratch the three-wide idea though, some like Baltoy have moves that get too many appeal points, and it throws the widths off too much for a three-wide table. [[User:Drake Clawfang|Drake Clawfang]] 04:57, 9 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
==Trainers?== | |||
Might it also be useful to somehow include what the trainers look like (Overworld Sprites or whatnot?) Or is this just me being lunacious? --[[User:AndyPKMN|AndyPKMN]] 01:59, 20 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:59, 20 October 2009
I filled in the contest opponents for Gen III, sorry if I made any mistakes but hey, when you work on a page for three hours, that'll happen. Second, I know there's some opponents exclusive to Emerald, I'm looking for info on them. The Gen 4 Contests. I have no idea how they work, so someone else has to fill that in. Drake Clawfang 20:31, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
I will fill you in with info on Normal, Great, etc. Rank Smart Super Contests as I am going to beat the Master Rank Smart Super Contest with my Metagross. I'll keep posted. (User: Pokefan12)
Length
Dang, this page is gonna be looooong once it's done. Is there any way to have the trainers for a particular rank beside each other, instead of above each other? It looks like it would fit... --AndyPKMN 11:53, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- I know to code the tables in such a way that the templates appear beside each other in two columns rather than one. I was told length isn't an issue though. Drake Clawfang 04:27, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- it does look massively long though and there is a lot of wasted space on the page. Solar Dragon 04:28, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Well, it be can undone, I'll change it to a two-column format and see what people think. Gimme a minute. Drake Clawfang 04:36, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- it does look massively long though and there is a lot of wasted space on the page. Solar Dragon 04:28, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Alright. Drake Clawfang 04:42, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Stacking them two wide wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing. —darklordtrom 04:52, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Alright. Drake Clawfang 04:42, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Done. Previews have also shown it could be reduced further to three-wide, if needed. Drake Clawfang 04:52, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- That's not bad at all. Great stuff.--Clarky13 04:55, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you. Scratch the three-wide idea though, some like Baltoy have moves that get too many appeal points, and it throws the widths off too much for a three-wide table. Drake Clawfang 04:57, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Trainers?
Might it also be useful to somehow include what the trainers look like (Overworld Sprites or whatnot?) Or is this just me being lunacious? --AndyPKMN 01:59, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
