User talk:Shadowvolcano: Difference between revisions
Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
alright, well thanks for all your help, a bunch of administrators (i know i can't spell it okay!) talking to me so freely, and im sorry to have wasted all your time! i'll try learn the way's of this site, thanks for your time! [[User:Shadowvolcano|Shadowvolcano]] 03:15, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | alright, well thanks for all your help, a bunch of administrators (i know i can't spell it okay!) talking to me so freely, and im sorry to have wasted all your time! i'll try learn the way's of this site, thanks for your time! [[User:Shadowvolcano|Shadowvolcano]] 03:15, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
:just testing this colon thing out |
Revision as of 03:26, 11 January 2010
Welcome
| |||||
|
YouTube comic
it isnt notable, sorry. -- MAGNEDETH 02:06, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
the comic is not notable. this is your final warning. if you create it one more time, you will be blocked for insubordination. -- MAGNEDETH 02:30, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
what do you mean by not notable? - unsigned comment from Shadowvolcano (talk • contribs) it exist's if that's what you mean look http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OI0ZKLPO5bk
- Sure it exists, but that has nothing to do with notability. There are thousands of fandom sites and comics like yours, but we're not gonna make an article about all of them. Just the big names. CuboneKing 02:41, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
- the definition of notable is:
A person or thing of distinction; Capable of being noted; noticeable; plain; evident; Worthy of notice; remarkable; memorable; noted or distinguished
- the comic is not popular enough for an article, basically. -- MAGNEDETH 02:43, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
- If you seek notability and popularity, may I suggest working on the quality of the comic? Especially in regards to the spelling and grammar. —darklordtrom 02:44, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
well i don't know, how to improve the quality, and im sure i've checked that the grammar's fine, and more tips? - unsigned comment from Shadowvolcano (talk • contribs)
sign my comment's with what sorry?
- *facepalms* He means to sign your signature with four tildes. You know... the little squiggly things that look like this: ~ ? --Shiay (The Morty Lover ♥) 02:51, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
- Read this policy page. And this Wikipedia article. —darklordtrom 02:52, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
im sorry i don't get the part with the colon's or something, so im supposed to makr my cvomments with 4 squiggly lines? like this Shadowvolcano 02:56, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, that's how you project your signature. Also, the section starts out with no colon. Then each next comment adds a colon. Such as one person starts a section with no colon. The next person uses 1 colon, and the next 2 colons, and the next 3 colons, etc.. If there is too many colons, one can reset the colons by putting none, maybe putting a note in parenthesis (()) that says "resetting indent". Turtwig A (talk | contribs) 03:00, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
- one colon ^
- two
- three
- four
- three
- two
none
- nine
Manual of style. -- MAGNEDETH 03:02, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
- okay im slowly getting it, but i still don't fully understand sorry...Shadowvolcano 03:04, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
i feel so stupid, and i know i am very stupid, can't even understand any of this, im sorry but do you HAVE to us these colon things? Shadowvolcano 03:07, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, you do. But that's okay. Everything takes its time. Now, how about you quit talking and go lurk for a bit to get the feel of this site. —darklordtrom 03:08, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
alright, well thanks for all your help, a bunch of administrators (i know i can't spell it okay!) talking to me so freely, and im sorry to have wasted all your time! i'll try learn the way's of this site, thanks for your time! Shadowvolcano 03:15, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
- just testing this colon thing out